How much does H&H Charitable Foundation give?

H&H Charitable Foundation reported 42 grants totaling $340,518 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 27 and 52 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does H&H Charitable Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (44%), International (17%), Youth Development (12%).

Who are H&H Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Amit Children Inc ($304k), ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA ($171k), American Friends of Leket Israel Inc ($103k).

Does H&H Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 23% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does H&H Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as H&H Charitable Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Fjc, Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc.

Where is H&H Charitable Foundation based?

H&H Charitable Foundation is based in NJ.

H&H Charitable Foundation

H&H Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

H&H Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$341k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$115k

Largest

01What it funds

0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$815kInternational$321kYouth Development$219kFood & Nutrition$110kCivil Rights$109kHealth$80kHuman Services$80kEducation$59kOther$0

02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k32 grants · $59k
$10k–50k9 grants · $167k
$50k–250k1 grant · $115k

$1,800

Median grant

States reached

$5.0M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
RELIGIOUS ZIONIST B'NAI AKIVA	$115,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL	$26,800
AMIT CHILDREN	$25,622
KEDMA	$25,532
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER IN JERUSALEM	$18,000
ETZION FOUNDATION	$18,000
SHARSHERET	$18,000
JGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC	$13,042
JEWISH NEWS SERVICEINC	$11,800
TZOHAR	$10,000
FERNANDO PULLUM COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER	$7,500
Individual grant recipient	$6,244
MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION	$6,000
CENTRAL FUND FOR ISRAEL	$5,720
FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH	$3,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of H&H Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 24% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 26%.

H&H Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)

How this is measured

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$2.0M · 73 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.0M

$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%

+5%

Still filing today

47%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationReligionHealthOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AC
AMIT CHILDREN INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $304k · revenue +134%
EF
ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA
9× · 2017–2025 · $171k · revenue +101%
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
4× · 2022–2025 · $103k · revenue +58%

Funded once

RZ
RELIGIOUS ZIONIST MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA
one grant, 2021 · $61k
ED
EFRAT DEVELOPMENT FUND
one grant, 2023 · $11k
NM
NY MEDICAL COLLEGE
one grant, 2017 · $9k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sherit Isroel

—

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion

American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education

American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion

Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion

American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion

Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

64/65

Grantees still filing

37/65

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,327,705International$409,350Religion$179,266Philanthropy$148,105Arts & Culture$69,830Health$42,956Human Services$27,613

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY45.1× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · David & Esther Muschel Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · M D Katz Foundation Inc · George and Ellen Friedman Family Foundation · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Daniel E and Joyce G Straus Family Foundation · Kolatch Family Foundation · The Kahan Family Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H&H Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H&H Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

11get no government money at all

8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on H&H’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home