Skip to content
Gupta Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gupta Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$521k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$285k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Youth Development$315kEducation$158kHealth$140kFood & Nutrition$118kPhilanthropy$77kInternational$36kCrime & Legal$10kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $285k
$5,100
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys & Girls Club Greater Nashua$285,000
Akshaya Patra Foundation USA$100,000
Paradada Pardadi Educational Society$43,500
Vision-Aid Inc$25,000
Derryfield Fund$16,500
Bridges Domestic & Sexual Violence Support Services Inc$11,012
Pratham USA$10,000
Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund$7,000
National Multiple Sclerosis Society - Greater New England Chapter$5,100
Boston Cardiac Foundation$5,000
Massachusetts Institute of Technology$5,000
Nashua Soup Kitchen & Shelter$3,500
New Hampshire Charitable Foundation$2,000
Individual grant recipient$750
The Hestia Fund$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC: $10k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$660k · 15 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$660k
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

80%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $315k · revenue +114%
  • AP
    AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $128k · revenue +46%
  • VI
    VISION-AID INCORPORATED
    5× · 2021–2025 · $39k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • ME
    Massachusetts Eye & Ear
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • II
    INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -42%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
2
Iisc Foundation

The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…

Education
3
Shiv Nadar Foundation

Shiv Nadar Foundation provides access to higher education tounderprivileged students and funds to other charitable organizations to supporteducation, research, social policies for women empowerment, affordable healthcareservices, medical…

Education
4
The Desai Foundation
Education
5
Khushii Usa Inc

The purpose of this corporation is to conduct activities through a holistic approach primarily for the benefit of disenfranchised children and their families in India and elsewhere in the world, including for the following specific…

International
6
Asha for Education

Our mission is to catalyze socio-econimic change in India through the education of underpriviledged children.

International
7
Asset India Foundation

Facilitating international charitable donations to support urgent and high-impact needs in India, including healthcare, education, livelihoods, and social welfare, by enabling U.S. donors to give to vetted causes through Milaap.org.

International
8
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Educate Girls

Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…

International
11
Shadhika Project

Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…

—
12
Intelehealth Inc

Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa); the most unlike its peers is Tie Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
11/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc: $314,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua IncAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $128,000 · Food & NutritionAKSHAYA PATRA FOU…NASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER INC: $5,084 · Food & NutritionPRATHAM USA: $83,000 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USAUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF G…New Hampshire Charitable Foundation: $7,000 · PhilanthropyNew Hampshire C…+2 more: $5,500 · PhilanthropyMassachusetts Eye & Ear: $50,000 · OtherMassachusetts Eye &…Derryfield Fund: $22,250 · OtherDerryfield FundNational Multiple Sclerosis Society - Greater New England Chapter: $15,100 · OtherNational Multiple S…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE S…SAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPE: $5,000 · OtherBRIDGES DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $5,000 · OtherSewa International Inc: $12,500 · OtherSewa International …BOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · OtherBOSTON CARDIAC FOUN…THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN INDIA …+6 more: $8,250 · Other+6 morePARDADA PARDADI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY INC: $43,500 · EducationPARDADA P…INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationINDIAN IN…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $5,000 · EducationMassachus…+1 more: $1,500 · EducationVISION-AID INCORPORATED: $38,500 · HealthBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES: $12,312 · Health+5 more: $2,500 · HealthFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $25,000 · Community ImprovementTIE FOUNDATION: $5,300 · Community Improvement
Youth Development$314,500Food & Nutrition$133,084Philanthropy$115,500Other$149,100Education$75,000Health$53,312Community Improvement$30,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc: $314,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $128,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $83,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPARDADA PARDADI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY INC: $43,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetVISION-AID INCORPORATED: $38,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetINDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSewa International Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES: $12,312 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTIE FOUNDATION: $5,300 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER INC: $5,084 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hestia Fund: $3,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetDESAI FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNASHUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sawhney Family Fdn Di…John P Stabile Family…Agnes M Lindsay TrustMorgan Stanley Global…New Hampshire Charita…Eastern Bank Foundati…Fidelity FoundationAmerican Online Givin…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…
Sawhney Family Fdn Dima-EtfNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sawhney Family Fdn Dima-Etf · John P Stabile Family Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gupta Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gupta Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gupta Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gupta Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gupta Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home