Skip to content
Gunglach Scho Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Gunglach Scho Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$83kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$168k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $500 → 10%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $600 → 16%CAPELLA UNIVERSITY: $500 → 11%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $500 → 11%CLARKS SUMMIT UNIVERSITY: $790 → 13%MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $790 → 15%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $600 → 16%ST JOSEPHS UNIVERSITY: $500 → 22%MARIST COLLEGE: $600 → 9%SUNY GENESO: $500 → 11%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $500 → 11%HERKIMER COLLEGE: $500 → 12%D'YOUVILLE COLLEGE: $500 → 13%SUNY ONEONTA: $500 → 13%LEMOYNE COLLEGE & MAUREEN E HARNAN: $500 → 14%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $790 → 14%SUNY CORTLAND: $1k → 15%ITHACA COLLEGE: $1k → 16%STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $790 → 16%FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $790 → 17%ALFRED STATE COLLEGE: $600 → 19%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $790 → 10%MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $600 → 15%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $3k → 13%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $600 → 14%SUNY CORTLAND: $1k → 15%ITHACA COLLEGE: $1k → 16%SUNY NEW PALTZ: $600 → 16%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $2k → 13%ITHACA COLLEGE: $1k → 16%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $2k → 13%ITHACA COLLEGE: $600 → 16%NYU REGISTRAR: $790 → 17%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $1k → 13%SUNY BROCKPORT: $1k → 14%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $1k → 13%SUNY BROCKPORT: $790 → 14%SUNY BROOME COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 20%ALESHA KHAN: $1k → 20%SUNY BROOME COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 20%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $600 → 20%SUNY BROOME COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $600 → 20%BUFFALO STATE: $600 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 24 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
18

Total granted

$67k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+23%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Cornell University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +46%
  • MU
    MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $2k · revenue +40%
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    4× · 2018–2021 · $2k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT
    one grant, 2020 · $790
  • MU
    MARIST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $600 · revenue +24%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
7
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
8
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marist University; the most unlike its peers is Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $10,180 · OtherBINGHAMTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $9,670 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF BUFFALOSUNY BROCKPORT: $3,790 · OtherSUNY BROCKPORTSUNY CORTLAND: $3,500 · OtherSUNY CORTLANDBROOME COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2,850 · OtherFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2,290 · OtherSUNY NEW PALTZ: $2,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,100 · Other+34 more: $22,860 · Other+34 moreITHACA COLLEGE: $4,600 · EducationITHACA COLLEGECornell University: $4,490 · EducationCornell UniversityMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $2,390 · EducationMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITYRochester Institute of Technology: $2,390 · EducationRochester Institute of TechnologyCLARKS SUMMIT UNIVERSITY: $2,290 · EducationCLARKS SUMMIT UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2,100 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYNAZARETH UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationNAZARETH UNIVERSITYLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationELMIRA COLLEGE: $1,000 · Education+7 more: $3,600 · Education+7 more
Other$59,340Education$25,360

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $4,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $4,490 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $2,390 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $2,390 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKS SUMMIT UNIVERSITY: $2,290 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARETH UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELMIRA COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetD'YOUVILLE UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds CLARKS SUMMIT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ELMIRA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds MARIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jessie H Baker Educat…Central New York Comm…Ruth W & Alice I Cham…Gazin Norbert L Educa…JM McDonald Foundatio…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jessie H Baker Educational FundNY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jessie H Baker Educational Fund · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Ruth W & Alice I Chamberlin Scholarship Tr · Gazin Norbert L Education Pfdn 101-0628960 · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gunglach Scho Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gunglach Scho Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • University of Delaware: 25% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gunglach Scho Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home