· Private foundation
Gund Geoffrey Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $385k
- $250k+6 grants · $5.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION | $1,200,000 |
| CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC | $1,110,000 |
| MARTHAS VINEYARD MUSEUM INC | $800,000 |
| MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION | $790,000 |
| NEW YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $766,180 |
| PUTNEY SCHOOL | $600,000 |
| BLUEDOT INSTITUTE INC | $200,000 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION INC | $75,000 |
| WAVE HILL INCORPORATED | $59,800 |
| BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION | $50,000 |
| RON RAPPAPORT SCHOLAR FUND | $25,000 |
| VOICES OF ASCENSION | $15,000 |
| GROTON SCHOOL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMThe Musical Arts Association5× · 2021–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +14%
- PSPUTNEY SCHOOL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +17%
- CMCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +119%
Funded once
- SCSTERN CENTER FOR LANGUAGE AND LEARNINGone grant, 2021 · $160k · revenue +9%
- YUYALE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $105k
- CCCLEVELAND CLINICone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…
The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverdale Neighborhood House Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Harpswell Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
- Who funds New York Historical Society ↗
- Who funds PUTNEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SAY YES CLEVELAND SCHOLARSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLUEDOT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds WAVE HILL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds STERN CENTER FOR LANGUAGE AND LEARNING ↗
- Who funds STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE HARPSWELL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GROTON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VOICES OF ASCENSION INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST TISBURY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds THE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: If Hummingbird Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · New Yankee Stadium Community Benefits Fund Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Pinkerton Foundation · Martha's Vineyard Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Prospect Hill Foundation Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Stonehouse Inc · Chutorian-Semler Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gund Geoffrey Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Foundation Inc — 34% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Boys & Girls Club Inc — 30% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Playhouse Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc — 2% of income from government
- Island Housing Trust Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Stern Center for Language and Learning — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gund Geoffrey Fdn?
Find your warmest path to Gund Geoffrey Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.