Skip to content

· Public charity

Gulf Coast Resource Conservation and Development Area

To provide local leadership in developing and carrying out an action oriented plan to conserve develop, and utilize the natural resources for the betterment of the region.

$929k
Granted FY2025still arriving
64
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.5MPublic Benefit$474kPublic Safety & Disaster$359kEnvironment$270kCommunity Improvement$267kHuman Services$243kRecreation & Sports$88kArts & Culture$86kOther$0
02FY2025 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 64 grants below total $897,333, the rows itemized in this filing. The $928,827 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,494 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $692k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $71k
$13,328
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WS NEAL HIGH SCHOOL$71,000
ALMA BRYANT HIGH SCHOOL$40,000
RIDGE ROAD VFD$29,775
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB FOLEY$25,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RC&D COUNCILS$22,500
BELFOREST CIVIC LEAGUE$20,000
INDEPENDENT ORDER OF ODDFELLOWS$20,000
ROBERTSDALE HIGH SCHOOL$17,908
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS$15,000
SWIFT SCHOOL$15,000
CITY OF EAST BREWTON$15,000
CITY OF FOLEY$15,000
FLOMATION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$15,000
GRAND BAY FIRE DISTRICT$15,000
CHARITABLE AID ASSOCIATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CITIZENS FOR A BETTER GRAND BAY: $18k → 19%CITIZENS FOR A BETTER GRAND BAY: $10k → 19%CITIZENS FOR A BETTER GRAND BAY: $8k → 19%MOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS: $15k → 19%MOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW: $12k → 19%MOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS: $12k → 19%MOWA TRIBAL OFFICE: $11k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 52 repeat orgs$780k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
43

Total granted

$2.7M
$482k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

25%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $298k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    Prodisee Pantry Inc
    5× · 2019–2025 · $59k · revenue +113%
  • PO
    PRIDE OF ATMORE INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $55k · revenue +134%
  • AC
    ALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF MOBILE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TO
    TOWN OF RIVERVIEW
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • LL
    Little Lagoon Preservation Society
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Bethel Volunteer Fire Dept

Volunteer fire department serving the residents of new bethel community in alabama

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Elberta Volunteer Fire Department

To train volunteer firefighters and respond to emergency calls within the area. to provide emergency care as necessary to the area based on 911 calls and emergency medical services.

—
3
Harvest Volunteer Fire Dept

To provide firefighting, fire prevention, rescue, haz mat,and first responder emergency medical services to the citizens of madison county, al and surrounding communities. provides safety eduation and awareness.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
South Baldwin Volunteer Fire Compan

Fire fighting services, fire prevention and fire education and training serving the south baldwin community

—
5
Farmington Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Volunteer fire department that serves the city of farmington, ms

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Dolphin Volunteer Fire Department

Fire protection services for dolphin, va and surrounding communities

—
7
Autaugaville Volunteer Fire and Rescue Inc

To perform any civic works which may be beneficial and useful to the peoples of autagua county, alabama, and the state of alabama. to do and perform all acts under the law of the state of alabama.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Gilmer Volunteer Fire Department

Fire control

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Monrovia Volunteer Fire Department

To provide firefighting, fire prevention, rescue, Haz-Mat, and first responder emergencymedical services to the citizens of Madison County AL and surrounding communities. Provided safety education and awareness. Area served is…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Port Bolivar Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

provides emergency fire services to Port Bolivar and mutual aid to Crystal Beach, Gilchrist and High Island.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Auslins Chapel Volunteer Fire

Provides volunteer fire protection for a rural alabama community

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Fannin County Volunteer Fire & Rescue Inc

To provide fire protection and rescue services for fannin county, georgia

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elsanor Volunteer Fire Dept & Rescu Rescue Unit Inc; the most unlike its peers is Independent Order of Odd Fellows. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
15/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BORD OF EDUCATION: $544,905 · OtherESCAMBIA COUNTY BORD OF EDUCATIONBoard of School Commissioners of Mobile County: $234,016 · OtherBoard of School Commissioners of Mobile CountyCITY OF EAST BREWTON: $137,604 · Other+95 more: $2,060,504 · Other+95 moreProdisee Pantry Inc: $59,138 · Public Safety & DisasterGRAND BAY FIRE DISTRICT: $23,380 · Public Safety & DisasterSPANISH FORT FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT INC: $21,055 · Public Safety & DisasterBELFOREST VOLUNTEER FIRE SEARCH AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT: $14,245 · Public Safety & DisasterELSANOR VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT & RESCU RESCUE UNIT INC: $13,804 · Public Safety & DisasterMAGNOLIA SPRINGS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $13,328 · Public Safety & DisasterLILLIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $11,771 · Public Safety & DisasterALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC: $52,590 · EnvironmentSouth Alabama Land Trust Inc: $23,492 · EnvironmentNational Association of RC&D Councils: $22,500 · EnvironmentLittle Lagoon Preservation Society: $16,724 · EnvironmentDauphin Island Sea Lab Foundation Inc: $14,180 · EnvironmentALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS: $10,000 · EnvironmentKeep Mobile Beautiful Inc: $7,737 · EnvironmentMOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIAN COMMISSION: $49,160 · Human ServicesCITIZENS FOR A BETTER GRAND BAY: $35,800 · Human ServicesPRIDE OF ATMORE INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyATMORE PRIVATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $18,099 · EducationPAULINE O ROURKE ELEMENTARY PTO INC: $15,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentMOBILE AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,042 · Youth Development
Other$2,977,029Public Safety & Disaster$156,721Environment$147,223Human Services$84,960Philanthropy$55,000Education$33,099Youth Development$30,042

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProdisee Pantry Inc: $59,138 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetPRIDE OF ATMORE INC: $55,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC: $52,590 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetMOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIAN COMMISSION: $49,160 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ALABAMA: $39,306 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCITIZENS FOR A BETTER GRAND BAY: $35,800 over 3y, 16% of budgetVETERANS RECOVERY RESOURCES: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBREWTON AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $25,919 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSouth Alabama Land Trust Inc: $23,492 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGRAND BAY FIRE DISTRICT: $23,380 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetSPANISH FORT FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT INC: $21,055 over 2y, 15% of budgetIndependent Order of Odd Fellows: $20,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetATMORE PRIVATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $18,099 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetESCAMBIA COUNTY FIRE & RESCUE SQUAD: $15,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSPANISH FORT SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetFAIRHOPE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $14,762 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBELFOREST VOLUNTEER FIRE SEARCH AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT: $14,245 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetDauphin Island Sea Lab Foundation Inc: $14,180 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetELSANOR VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT & RESCU RESCUE UNIT INC: $13,804 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMAGNOLIA SPRINGS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $13,328 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL DBA ATMORE ROTARY CLUB: $12,703 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetLILLIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $11,771 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTME: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAVE A STRAY: $9,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBREWTON SPORTSMAN CLUB: $9,400 over 1y, 18% of budgetDAUPHIN ISLAND BIRD SANCTUARIES INC: $9,156 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFAIRHOPE EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $7,940 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKeep Mobile Beautiful Inc: $7,737 over 1y, 31% of budgetBAKER HONEYBEES BOOSTER CLUB: $7,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetSTAPLETON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATED: $5,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Prodisee Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRIDE OF ATMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIAN COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR A BETTER GRAND BAY ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS RECOVERY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds BREWTON AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH ALABAMA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL26.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · Alabama Humanities Alliance · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Fairhope Single Tax Corporation · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · Lillian C McGowin Foundation · Tonsmeire Charitable Foundation Trust 2008 · The Sybil and White Smith Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gulf Coast Resource Conservation and Development Area funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gulf Coast Resource Conservation and Development Area. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gulf Coast Resource Conservation and Development Area?

    Find your warmest path to Gulf Coast Resource Conservation and Development Area through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gulf Coast Resource Conservation and Development Area’s filings →

    More from the funding graph