· Private foundation
Guang-Yu Chinese Culture & Art Center
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $4k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARYLAND PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATI | $28,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO GU-ZHENG MUSIC SOCIET | $2,000 |
| CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERI | $1,000 |
| PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPURPLE SILK MUSIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2022 · $32k · revenue -14%
- NYNathan Yip Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +82%
- SFSan Francisco Guzheng Music Society8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue -66%
Funded once
- CPCHINESE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $6k
- CCContra Costa Chinese Cultural Enrichment Orgone grant, 2017 · $2k
- CCCHINESE CULTURE FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCOgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +243%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To introduce classic chinese culture to the residents of san francisco bay area; to promote ancient asian arts to san francisco bay area.
Chinese Cultural Productions originates and performs challenging and risk taking contemporary American art that is firmly rooted in Chinese cultural traditions. To implement our mission, Chinese Cultural Productions produces an annual San…
Founded in 1995, the american friends of the shanghai museum is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to raise awareness and financial support for the shanghai museum, continuing a distinguished history of patron support for…
The organization presents performances, lecture & demonstrations. The goal is to have the people learn more about the the ancient Asian Shadow Theater.
Own and operate a collaborative platform anchored in san francisco chinatown that celebrates, explores, and supports leading and pioneering creative experessions at the intersection of community, culture, art and media.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese Culture Foundation of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Guzheng Music Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PURPLE SILK MUSIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MPT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Nathan Yip Foundation ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Guzheng Music Society ↗
- Who funds CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds CONTRA COSTA CHINESE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CULTURE FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds World Arts West ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Guang-Yu Chinese Culture & Art Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.