Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Gt Holly Skolnick Fellowship Foundation Inc (Fka Gth Fellowship Foundation Inc)

Foundation was established to assist lawyers practicing within a public interest law practice and to support irc 501(c) (3) charities whose exempt function is related to this.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Crime & Legal$8.2MCivil Rights$60k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,084,500
Median grant
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS$1,084,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.2M · 5 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$8.2M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+134%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EJ
    EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.1M · revenue +33%
  • LC
    Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +94%
  • THE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • MF
    Mobilization for Justice Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +18%
  • COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +134%
  • WA
    WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE LEGAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $8,087,543 · Crime & LegalEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS+3 more — $28,000 · Crime & LegalLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $60,000 · OtherMobilization for Justice Inc — $50,000 · Other+1 more — $2,500 · OtherWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Crime & Legal$8,115,543Other$112,500Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $8,087,543 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMobilization for Justice Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT — $10,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gt Holly Skolnick Fellowship Foundation Inc (Fka Gth Fellowship Foundation Inc) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 38%
  • Community Legal Aid Society Inc38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gt Holly Skolnick Fellowship Foundation Inc (Fka Gth Fellowship Foundation Inc)?

Find your warmest path to Gt Holly Skolnick Fellowship Foundation Inc (Fka Gth Fellowship Foundation Inc) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph