Skip to content

· Private foundation

Growthseed Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$6kEnvironment$3kCommunity Improvement$1kEmployment$1kHuman Services$500Philanthropy$300Public Safety & Disaster$200Health$200
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$247k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
StreetWise Partners Inc$500
GiveDirectly$500
Recycleballs$500
Cals Angels$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Emergency Relief Fund for Brazil: $200 → 8%Kiva: $85 → 10%GoFundMe: $300 → 14%StreetWise Partners Inc: $500 → 17%Greenpeace USA: $500 → 14%Samaritan's Purse: $500 → 21%Cals Angels: $200 → 8%Ek Kadam Aur Foundation: $500 → 8%The Nature Conservancy: $500 → 7%Recycleballs: $100 → 10%Kiva: $70 → 10%AIF Chicago: $5k → 17%StreetWise Partners Inc: $1k → 14%Nature Conservancy: $500 → 7%Recycleballs: $50 → 10%Kiva: $31 → 10%StreetWise Partners Inc: $500 → 17%The Smile and Olive Foundation: $200 → 14%Recycleballs: $500 → 10%Kiva: $5 → 10%Earthjustice: $500 → 10%Earthjustice: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 65% of Growthseed Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 5% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 2%.

Growthseed Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3k · 3 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$3k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEnvironmentEmploymentInternationalReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    STREETWISE PARTNERS INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $1k · revenue -21%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +26%
  • R
    RECYCLEBALLS
    3× · 2022–2025 · $650 · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • SP
    StreetWise Partners Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • EK
    EK KADAM AURgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +166%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Swaniti Initiative

Our mission is to help build strong and supportive ecosystems that can stand up to the realities of a changing climate. today, countries are expected to transition quickly to cleaner energy, strengthen social protection and improve systems…

Public Benefit
6
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Global Voice
—
9
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
10
The 5 Gyres Institute

The 5 Gyres Institute (5 Gyres) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles, with a global network of supporters united in the pursuit of a planet free of plastic pollution. 5 Gyres' mission is to empower action against the…

—
11
Nia Tero Foundation

Nia tero works alongside indigenous peoples to secure their guardianship of vital ecosystems. indigenous peoples are guardians of earth.(see schedule o)

Environment
12
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Givedirectly Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smile & Olive Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $5,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientStreetWise Partners Inc: $1,000 · OtherStreetWise Partners IncTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more: $400 · OtherEARTHJUSTICE: $1,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICERECYCLEBALLS: $650 · EnvironmentRECYCLEBALLSSTREETWISE PARTNERS INC: $1,000 · EmploymentEK KADAM AUR: $500 · InternationalKIVA MICROFUNDS: $191 · InternationalGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $500 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 · ReligionGOFUNDMEORG: $300 · PhilanthropySMILE & OLIVE FOUNDATION: $200 · Philanthropy
Other$8,000Environment$1,650Employment$1,000International$691Human Services$500Religion$500Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETWISE PARTNERS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRECYCLEBALLS: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEK KADAM AUR: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE & OLIVE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $191 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Growthseed Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Growthseed Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Growthseed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph