Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Grover C and Jane C McNair Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2017
18
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
3
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTENARY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$7,000
CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY$500
SENIOR SERVICES$500
UNITED WAY$500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$300
COMMUNITY CARE CENTER$300
CANCER SERVICES$200
SALVATION ARMY$200
CARE$200
SAMARITAN MINISTRIES$200
HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE$200
AMERICAN RED CROSS$100
PIEDMONT OPERA THEATRE$100
FRIENDS OF OLD SALEM$100
WINSTON-SALEM SYMPHONY$100
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%SENIOR SERVICES: $500 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

2
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

3
Tri-County Community Health Council Inc

Provider of comprehensive, compassionate, high quality primary medical, dental, pharmacy and behavioral health services in southeastern north carolina.

4
Care Share Health Alliance Inc

Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change. guided by the mission of collaborating for health and a vision of communities that are healthy and…

Health
5
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
6
Carolina Health Centers Inc

Carolina health centers offers primary care and patient support services to improve health, well-being and quality of life throughout the communities we serve.

Health
7
Samaritan Health Center Inc

To provide high quality health care services to uninsured and underserved patients in Durham, NC and surrounding areas.

Health
8
Community Free Clinic Inc

The mission of the Clinic is to help adults move toward wellness by providing healthcare and pharmacy services. The Clinic accomplishes its mission by removing the barriers of limited financial resources and lack of health insurance.…

Health
9
The Winston-Salem Rescue Mission Inc

The winston-salem rescue mission, inc. is a christian, non-denominational service ministry, existing to help our hurting neighbors find hope and healing through the transforming gospel of jesus christ.

Housing & Shelter
10
Carolina Seniorcare

A christian ministry providing vibrant living, diverse programs of outreach and compassionate services.

Health
11
Community Care of North Carolina Inc

To foster and enhance quality, efficiency and access to health care services for patients in need of such services, particularly patient populations that are vulnerable and/or underserved.

Health
12
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTENARY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $7,000 · OtherCENTENARY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHUNITED WAY — $500 · OtherUNITED WAYSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $300 · Other+5 more — $700 · Other+5 moreSENIOR SERVICES INC — $500 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERV…CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC — $500 · Human ServicesCRISIS CONT…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…COMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY — $300 · HealthCANCER SERVICES INC — $200 · HealthCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $200 · InternationalSAMARITAN MINISTRIES — $200 · Housing & ShelterOLD SALEM INC — $100 · Arts & CultureWINSTON-SALEM SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $100 · Arts & CultureNorth Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc — $100 · Environment
Other$8,500Human Services$1,100Health$500International$200Housing & Shelter$200Arts & Culture$200Environment$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSENIOR SERVICES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SERVICES INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN MINISTRIES — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD SALEM INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reynolds American FoundationNC19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reynolds American Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Strickland Family Foundation Cynthia a S Graham · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · J & J Neely Foundation · The Sara Smith Self Foundation Inc · James T & Louise R Broyhilll Foundation · Pfefferkorn Foundation Inc · Wake Forest University Health Sciences · North Carolina Baptist Hospital · Flow Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Grover C and Jane C McNair Charitable Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph