Skip to content
Grove Family Educational Trust 00c671 at a glance

· Private foundation

Grove Family Educational Trust 00c671

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$127kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,012
Median grant
2
States reached
$593k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$7,082
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$3,035
U OF M ANN ARBOR$3,035
Eastern Michigan University$2,023
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$2,023
Michigan Technological University$2,023
Bowling Green State University$1,012
U OF M DEARBORN$1,012
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$1,012
College for Creative Studies$1,012
Schoolcraft College$1,012
Northwood University$1,012
Western Michigan University$1,012
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $2k → 15%BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $1k → 16%MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2k → 9%GROVE CITY COLLEGE: $1k → 13%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA: $2k → 13%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $2k → 13%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%Northwood University: $1k → 9%MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 10%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $1k → 12%ALMA COLLEGE: $2k → 12%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%Michigan Technological University: $2k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 20%BAPTIST BIBLE COLLEGE: $1k → 15%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $12k → 18%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $2k → 14%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR: $12k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $1k → 18%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%MOTION PICTURE INSTITUTE: $2k → 8%EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%ALBION COLLEGE: $1k → 14%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR: $3k → 14%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 21%Eastern Michigan University: $2k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 21%U OF M ANN ARBOR: $3k → 14%EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN- DEARBORN: $5k → 21%HENRY FORD COLLEGE: $2k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF DEARBORN: $1k → 21%HENRY FORD COLLEGE: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
OH
PA
MO
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 9 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
22

Total granted

$87k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+9%

Still filing today

11%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
    2× · 2022–2023 · $13k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN- DEARBORN
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • TO
    THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
4
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
7
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
8
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
9
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
10
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
11
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
12
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albion College; the most unlike its peers is Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $15,140 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $13,092 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TOLEDOWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,323 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,166 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $8,172 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $7,112 · OtherEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $7,082 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN- DEARBORN: $5,120 · Other+18 more: $31,543 · Other+18 moreThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $2,011 · EducationThe University…LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $2,011 · EducationLAWRENCE TECHN…Nova Southeastern University Inc: $2,011 · EducationNova Southeast…AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,011 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVE…ALMA COLLEGE: $2,011 · EducationALMA COLLEGELOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $2,011 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERS…KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $1,024 · EducationKALAMAZOO COLL…ALBION COLLEGE: $1,024 · EducationALBION COLLEGEGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $1,024 · EducationGROVE CITY COL…BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $1,024 · EducationBERKLEE COLLEG…Northwood University: $1,012 · EducationNorthwood Univ…COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $1,012 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR CR…+1 more: $511 · EducationBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $15,177 · Youth DevelopmentBurr Oak 4-…
Other$109,750Education$18,697Youth Development$15,177

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $15,177 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $2,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $2,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $2,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $2,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $2,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $1,024 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $1,024 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $1,024 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $1,024 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwood University: $1,012 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $1,012 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $511 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALMA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwood University ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA12.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grove Family Educational Trust 00c671 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grove Family Educational Trust 00c671. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grove Family Educational Trust 00c671’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home