Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gronowski Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$92kEducation$65kHealth$37kArts & Culture$27kInternational$7kReligion$3k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$60k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UND FOUNDATION$15,000
PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC$5,000
TASK FORCE DAGGER FOUNDATION$5,000
AUTISM BREAKTHROUGH OF KNOXVILLE$3,000
LIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKS$2,000
ROSIE'S RANCH$600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 3%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROSIE'S RANCH: $600 → 3%ROSIES RANCH: $600 → 3%ROSIES RANCH: $600 → 3%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$228k · 9 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$228k
$3k

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    Task Force Dagger Foundation
    6× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +84%
  • PL
    PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +269%
  • H4
    HEARTS 4 MINDS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • A
    AAROHI
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Moonrise Therapeutics

To nurture the well being of individuals and families through therapeutic and educational experiences that integrate clinical expertise, equine connections and other innovative approaches.

Health
2
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
3
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

4
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
5
Daybreak Inc

Daybreak helps Alaskans facing serious mental illness, brain injuries, or reentry after incarceration find stability and independence. Through personalized resource facilitation, Daybreak connects clients to housing, employment,…

6
Lighthouse Counseling and Family Resource Center

We help individuals and families heal by providing counseling, educational classes, and easy access to resources.

Human Services
7
Rise Above the Disorder

Rise Above The Disorder is a non-profit centered on making mental health care accessible and affordable to everyone. Our cause was founded in 2012 as a team of volunteers helping people find local therapists and crowd-funding the cost of…

Health
8
Breakthru House Inc

Transforming lives of women struggling with drug and alcohol addiction by providing a long-term residential program to experience physical, emotional and spiritual healing through recovery. as the first long-term residential recovery…

Health
9
Transitional Learning Center at Galveston

The Transitional Learning Center (TLC) provides personalized care to treat the unique challenges of brain injury with the singular purpose of achieving the best possible outcome for patients and their families.

Health
10
Friends of Leaps & Bounds Pediatric Therapy Inc

To assist economically disadvantaged people with disabilities through providing physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and hippotherapy treatments at no cost or low cost

Health
11
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
12
Lightshare Behavioral Wellness & Recovery Inc

Lightshare Behavioral Wellness & Recovery prevents and treats alcohol and drug addictions and associated disorders. We foster fully functionong, productive individuals by offering a full array of services in partnership with our community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rosie's Ranch and the most unlike its peers is Precious Lamb Preschool Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Task Force Dagger Foundation — $90,000 · PhilanthropyTask Force Dagger FoundationPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC — $40,000 · EducationPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INCUND Alumni Association and Foundation — $25,000 · EducationUND Alumni Association and FoundationLIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKSHOP INC — $17,000 · EducationLIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKSHOP INCHEARTS 4 MINDS INC — $25,000 · HealthHEARTS 4 MIN…LIGHHOUSE WRITERS WORKS — $10,000 · OtherAAROHI — $3,442 · OtherBreakthrough Corporation D/B/A Autism Breakthrough of Knoxville — $12,000 · Housing & ShelterGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $6,884 · InternationalROSIE'S RANCH — $1,800 · Human Services
Philanthropy$90,000Education$82,000Health$25,000Other$13,442Housing & Shelter$12,000International$6,884Human Services$1,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTask Force Dagger Foundation — $90,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetUND Alumni Association and Foundation — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS 4 MINDS INC — $25,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKSHOP INC — $17,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBreakthrough Corporation D/B/A Autism Breakthrough of Knoxville — $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $6,884 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S RANCH — $1,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gronowski Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph