Skip to content
Groh George W Tr FBO Med Research at a glance

· Private foundation

Groh George W Tr FBO Med Research

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$122k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$214kEducation$15k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $116k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH$12,000
MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION$12,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CTR$11,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$11,000
CURESEARCH FOR CHILDRENS CANCER$10,000
ROSKAMP INSTITUTE INC$10,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D (FORMERLY JDRF)$10,000
HYPERACUSIS RESEARCH LIMITED INC$10,000
ENDURING HEARTS INC$10,000
THE EHE FOUNDATION$10,000
THE OSTEOSARCOMA INSTITUTE$5,586
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HYPERACUSIS RESEARCH LIMITED INC: $10k → 8%BREAKTHROUGH T1D (FORMERLY JDRF): $10k → 7%INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $12k → 22%INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%KELM INC: $15k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CTR: $11k → 9%THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $12k → 17%THE OSTEOSARCOMA INSTITUTE: $6k → 14%ROSKAMP INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 10%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FDN INC: $15k → 13%THE EHE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ENDURING HEARTS INC: $10k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $11k → 13%MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $12k → 12%CURESEARCH FOR CHILDRENS CANCER: $10k → 8%THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $10k → 17%MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $12k → 12%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $12k → 12%MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $12k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Pano Koumantaros Cancer Research Fund Inc
Philanthropy
4
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Brain Cancer Research Institute

The organization conducts research and trials for delivery of personalizedmedicine through a regenerative process and the utilization of artificialintelligence. this research is conducted through the use of transdisciplinaryapproaches for…

Health
7
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
10
Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute

The Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute ALCMI is dedicated to catalyzing and accelerating the discovery, development and delivery of new and more effective treatment options for lung cancer patients.

Health
11
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
12
International Cancer Advocacy Network

Ican's mission is two-fold: to optimize stage iv cancer patient survival and work to attain the highest possible quality of life. ican assists stage iv cancer patients with 1) direct patient navigation and customized advocacy services; 2)…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Institute for Cancer Research; the most unlike its peers is Kelm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $47,405 · HealthTHE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATIONTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $21,500 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCHDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INCThe Institute For Cancer Research: $12,000 · HealthThe Institute For Cancer ResearchAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCHYPERACUSIS RESEARCH LIMITED INC: $10,000 · HealthHYPERACUSIS RESEARCH LIMITED INCThe Roskamp Institute Inc: $10,000 · HealthThe Roskamp Institute IncCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INCAmerican Diabetes Association: $10,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes AssociationTHE EHE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTHE EHE FOUNDATIONENDURING HEARTS INC: $10,000 · HealthENDURING HEARTS INCCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER: $10,000 · HealthCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER+1 more: $5,586 · HealthINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherINTERNATIO…BREAKTHROUGH T1D (FORMERLY JDRF): $10,000 · OtherBREAKTHROU…KELM INC: $14,634 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $11,000 · International
Health$182,491Other$21,000Education$14,634International$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $47,405 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $21,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKELM INC: $14,634 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetThe Institute For Cancer Research: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHYPERACUSIS RESEARCH LIMITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetThe Roskamp Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EHE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetENDURING HEARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

J Roland Gilbert Mary…Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
J Roland Gilbert Mary R GilbertMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J Roland Gilbert Mary R Gilbert · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Groh George W Tr FBO Med Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Groh George W Tr FBO Med Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 77%
  • The Roskamp Institute Inc: 77% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Groh George W Tr FBO Med Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home