Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grits Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$370k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MEducation$415kFood & Nutrition$110kHuman Services$105kArts & Culture$82kInternational$55kScience & Tech$35kEnvironment$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $265k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$165,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$100,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$15,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL$10,000
COHEN BRAY HOUSE OAKLAND$10,000
MEDICAL BRIDGES$10,000
NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER$10,000
URBAN HARVEST$10,000
THE RISE SCHOOL$10,000
HOUSTON MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES$5,000
SMALL STEPS NURTURING CENTER$5,000
ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$5,000
SPCA OF SOLANO COUNTY$5,000
CASA DE ESPERANZA$5,000
HOUSTON ARBORETUM & NATURE CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%COHEN BRAY HOUSE OAKLAND: $10k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $115k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $85k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $80k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $80k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $70k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $59k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $15k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $10k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $10k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $10k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $10k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $10k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $10k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $10k → 16%URBAN HARVEST: $10k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $165k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $115k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $75k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $25k → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $25k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NEUHAUS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $10k → 16%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $15k → 16%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 22 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
5

Total granted

$2.4M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
0%

Still filing today

55%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthEducationInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $705k · revenue +105%
  • UH
    Urban Harvest Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +87%
  • TW
    The W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • HS
    HOUSTON SOCIETY OF AIA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • SB
    SAVE BUFFALO BAYOU
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
2
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
3
The Houston Audubon Society

To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…

Environment
4
John P McGovern Museum of Health & Medical Science

The Health Museum is an innovative science center that provides an interactive and entertaining experience for all ages, promotes understanding and appreciation of the human body, mind, and spirit, and inspires a lifelong commitment to…

Arts & Culture
5
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
6
Houston Academy of Medicine

The mission of the Houston Academy of Medicine is to support the community service, education, scientific, and charitable programs for physicians, their patients, and the community at large in Harris County.

Education
7
Houston Zoo Inc

Mission: Connect communities with animals, inspiring action to save wildlife. Vision: Be a leader in the global movement to save wildlife. (Continued on Schedule O) Houston Zoo, Inc. (HZI) strives to be a zoo that practices exemplary…

Animals
8
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
9
Houston Parks Board

The Houston Parks Board mission is to expand, improve, and protect parks and greenspace in the Houston region.

Philanthropy
10
Garden Club of Houston

The Club's mission is to stimulate the knowledge and love of gardening and to protect the quality of the environment through programs and action in the fields of education, conservation, and civic improvement.

Environment
11
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
12
Hermann Park Conservancy

Hermann Park Conservancy is a citizens organization dedicated to the stewardship and improvement of Hermann Park - today and for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Arboretum & Nature Center; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $788,531 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOODTexas Children's Hospital: $705,000 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLTHE RISE SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherTHE RISE SCHOOLThe W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation: $90,000 · OtherThe W Oscar Neuhaus Memo…CASA DE ESPERANZA: $75,000 · OtherCASA DE ESPERANZAMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $40,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF FINE ARTSCOHEN BRAY HOUSE OAKLAND: $30,000 · OtherCOHEN BRAY HOUSE OAKLANDGLENWOOD FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherSPCA OF SOLANO COUNTY: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $65,000 · Other+7 moreUrban Harvest Inc: $95,000 · EnvironmentHouston Arboretum & Nature Center: $30,000 · EnvironmentSAVE BUFFALO BAYOU: $5,000 · EnvironmentTeach for America Inc: $95,000 · EducationSmall Steps Nurturing Center: $35,000 · EducationARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $42,000 · Arts & CultureHouston Museum of Natural Science: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMedical Bridges Inc: $55,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,000 · Animals
Health$1,493,531Other$520,000Environment$130,000Education$130,000Arts & Culture$67,000International$60,000Animals$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $788,531 over 9y, 42% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $705,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Harvest Inc: $95,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $95,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation: $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMedical Bridges Inc: $55,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $42,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSmall Steps Nurturing Center: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Arboretum & Nature Center: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHouston Museum of Natural Science: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE BUFFALO BAYOU: $5,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Urban Harvest Inc ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds The W Oscar Neuhaus Memorial Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Medical Bridges Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Small Steps Nurturing Center ↗
  • Who funds Houston Arboretum & Nature Center ↗
  • Who funds Houston Museum of Natural Science ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE BUFFALO BAYOU ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tapeats FundDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tapeats Fund · Marek Family Foundation · Strake Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grits Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grits Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Archaeological Institute of America: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grits Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Grits Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grits’ filings →

More from the funding graph