Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grig Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$14kReligion$9kInternational$4kHuman Services$3kHealth$3kFood & Nutrition$2kPhilanthropy$2kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$125
Median grant
7
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE$4,099
Individual grant recipient$3,914
REFORM CONGREGATION OF KENESETH ISR$2,055
AEPHI$875
B FOUNDATION$800
DICKINSON COLLEGE$500
ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION$300
LONGWOOD GARDENS$250
Individual grant recipient$165
PHILAD MUSEUM OF ART$125
Individual grant recipient$125
GREENE COUNTRIE GARDEN CLUB$105
Individual grant recipient$100
PSPCA$100
Individual grant recipient$63
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%JASON FOUNDATION: $200 → 8%BTST CARES: $375 → 19%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $3k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $50 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$55k · 39 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
49

Total granted

$55k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

46%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue +11%
  • IT
    ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +80%
  • PV
    PERKIOMEN VALLEY LIBRARY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $600
  • HC
    HOBART COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $550
  • LS
    LARRY S ROSEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
12
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service of Greater Philadelphia; the most unlike its peers is Camp Cocker Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
24/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $11,434 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREIndividual grant recipient: $8,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREFORM CONGREGATION OF KENESETH ISR: $7,480 · OtherREFORM CONGREGATION OF KENESETH ISRIndividual grant recipient: $3,914 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKENESETH ISRAEL: $3,080 · OtherKENESETH ISRAELJOHN CARROLL SCHOOL INC: $2,650 · Other+63 more: $14,932 · Other+63 moreISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $4,450 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC: $250 · InternationalJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $2,550 · Human ServicesBTST CARES INC: $375 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $250 · Human ServicesTHE JASON FOUNDATION INC: $200 · Human ServicesDICKINSON COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $550 · EducationLARRY S ROSEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $200 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $150 · EducationBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $100 · EducationTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $1,300 · HealthUpper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc: $450 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 · Health+5 more: $200 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $990 · PhilanthropyLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $710 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $200 · PhilanthropyMontgomery County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $350 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $350 · AnimalsPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $200 · AnimalsCAMP COCKER RESCUE INC: $200 · Animals
Other$52,090International$4,700Human Services$3,375Education$2,500Health$2,400Philanthropy$1,900Animals$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $11,434 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $4,450 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $2,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERKIOMEN VALLEY LIBRARY: $1,375 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $990 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $710 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLARRY S ROSEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget4MyCity Inc: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUpper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE THEATRE OF ITHACA INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBTST CARES INC: $375 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMontgomery County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN BALLET COMPANY: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN PITTSBURGH SECTION: $265 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP COCKER RESCUE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JASON FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMain Line Art Center: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEMENTIA SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOYLESTOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAVEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEDY'S TEAM INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUCKS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILL FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds PERKIOMEN VALLEY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds LONGWOOD GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds LARRY S ROSEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 4MyCity Inc ↗
  • Who funds Upper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds STATE THEATRE OF ITHACA INC ↗
  • Who funds BTST CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds Montgomery County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN BALLET COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN PITTSBURGH SECTION ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chubb Charitable FoundationPA18.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grig Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grig Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • 4MyCity Inc: 7% of income from government
  • New Haven Legal Assistance Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Chill Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grig Fund?

Find your warmest path to Grig Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grig’s filings →

More from the funding graph