Skip to content

· Private foundation

Griffiths Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$180kHealth$135kFood & Nutrition$120kHuman Services$120kArts & Culture$60kYouth Development$30kHousing & Shelter$25kReligion$20kOther$0
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$25,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$10,000
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$10,000
PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION$10,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$10,000
TWIN CITY PUBLIC TELEVISION$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
MAYO FOUNDATION$10,000
SHARING AND CARING HANDS$10,000
DINOMIGHTS$5,000
ELEVATE LIFE$5,000
RISEN CHRIST CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
MINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS$5,000
STAPLES MOTLEY ISD#2170$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$675k · 15 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$675k
$5k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementEmploymentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PN
    PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +26%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +90%
  • SA
    SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • SM
    STAPLES MOTLEY SCHOLARSHIP (HEALTHCARE)
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
2
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
3
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
4
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
5
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
8
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
10
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dinomights. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATIONTWIN CITY PUBLIC TELEVISION: $60,000 · OtherTWIN CITY PUBLIC TELEVISIONMAYO FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATIONRISEN CHRIST SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherRISEN CHRIST SCHOOLNET MINISTRIES: $20,000 · OtherNET MINISTRIESSTAPLES MOTLEY ISD#2170: $20,000 · OtherSTAPLES MOTLEY ISD#2170+1 more: $5,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PRO…SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CARING …FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $60,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR I…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $60,000 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CH…DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $45,000 · EducationElevate Life: $25,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $20,000 · HealthDINOMIGHTS: $30,000 · Community ImprovementMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS: $25,000 · EmploymentJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$315,000Human Services$120,000International$120,000Education$45,000Health$45,000Community Improvement$30,000Employment$25,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDINOMIGHTS: $30,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetElevate Life: $25,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds DINOMIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds Elevate Life ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harold F Griffiths FoundationMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harold F Griffiths Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Griffiths Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Griffiths Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Griffiths Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Griffiths Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Griffiths’ filings →

More from the funding graph