Skip to content

· Public charity

Grid Alternatives

GRID ALTERNATIVES envisions a rapid, equitable transition to a world powered by renewable energy that benefits everyone.

$4.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Environment$10MPhilanthropy$2.0MHousing & Shelter$882kEducation$660kHealth$544kArts & Culture$275k
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $4,749,229, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,884,667 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $135,438 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $4.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$200,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PINE POINT MICROGRID$250,000
TOIYABE INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT INC$250,000
CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE RADIO$200,000
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA$200,000
DRY CREEK RANCHERIA$200,000
GUIDIVILLE RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA$200,000
MICCOSUKEE CORPORATION$200,000
WARM SPRINGS POWER & WATER ENTERPRISES$200,000
THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES$200,000
SOVEREIGN ENERGY$200,000
SCOTTS VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS$200,000
SAN ILDEFONSO SERVICES LLC$200,000
BAD RIVER TRIBE$200,000
PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE$200,000
SHOSHONE PAIUTE TRIBES$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MICCOSUKEE CORPORATION: $200k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
SD
IN
CA
CO
AZ
NM
KS
AR
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 17 repeat orgs$9.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
46

Total granted

$5.0M
$6.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+47%

Still filing today

18%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UT
    UNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    3× · 2019–2023 · $335k · revenue +40%
  • NR
    NATIVE RENEWABLES INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $195k · revenue +87%
  • AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND
    2× · 2019–2021 · $50k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • SI
    SPOKANE INDIAN HOUSING AUTHORITY
    one grant, 2018 · $498k
  • RC
    RED CLIFF BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • LL
    LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Turtle Mountain Community College

Turtle mountain community college is committed to functioning as an autonomous indian controlled college on the turtle mountain chippewa reservation focusing on general studies, undergraduate education, career & technical education,…

Education
2
California Indian Nations College

California Indian college (cinc), is dedicated to building educational strength and will provide educational opportunities leading to degrees for American Indians and all students with indigenous backgrounds

Education
3
Cankdeska Cikana Community College

To provide higher education opportunities, at the community college level, including vocational and technical training. as a tribal community college, we emphasize the teaching and learning of dakota culture and language toward the…

Education
4
White Earth Tribal and Community College

White earth tribal and community college, an anishinaabe controlled liberal arts institution of higher education, is dedicated to educational excellence through provision of culturally relevant curriculum, in partnership with students,…

Education
5
Northwest Tribal Emergency Management Council

Education: Building internal infrastructure and internal capacity for emergency management public health and public safety to include homeland security programs and law enforcement programs for any of the 574 Tribal Federally Recognized…

—
6
Little Priest Tribal College

Little priest tribal college is established as an educational institution by the winnebago tribe of nebraska to fulfill the goal of its namesake, chief little priest, "be strong and educate my children".

Education
7
North Dakota Tribal College System

Advancing tribal colleges through collaboration and shared goals. ndtcs leverages the higher education experience by sharing ideas and broadening networks and alliances, toward improving students' outcomes.

Education
8
Chief Dull Knife College

Provide educational and cultural leadership to the residents of the northern cheyenne reservation and surrounding communities.

—
9
American Indian Services

We're dedicated to helping Native Americans have access to a quality education, while still preserving their culture and honoring their heritage. Our mission is to provide preparatory programs for youth and financial assistance for those…

Human Services
10
The Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation

We are a Native-led Indigenous rights organization. We are dedicated to our mission of protecting & revitalizing Indigenous cultures, empowering them in the direct application of their traditional knowledge & practices on their ancestral…

Arts & Culture
11
Northern California Indian Development Council Inc

Research, develop, and administer social and economic development programs to meet the needs of indian and native american communities and individuals residing in the state of california. also for the conservation and preservation of…

—
12
Institute of American Indian Arts & Alaska Native

To provide education and instruction in the scholarly study and preservation of indian art to empower creativity and leadership in native arts and cultures through higher education, life-long learning and outreach.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College of the Menominee Nation; the most unlike its peers is Tebughna Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA: $506,994 · OtherSPOKANE INDIAN HOUSING AUTHORITY: $497,791 · Other+74 more: $11,758,999 · Other+74 moreTanana Chiefs Conference: $555,174 · HealthTOIYABE INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT: $250,000 · HealthUNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $335,000 · EducationNORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE: $180,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $50,000 · EducationSOVEREIGN ENERGY: $200,000 · EnvironmentMICCOSUKEE CORPORATION: $200,000 · Human ServicesNATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $195,000 · Arts & CultureTebughna Foundation: $50,000 · Philanthropy
Other$12,763,784Health$805,174Education$565,000Environment$200,000Human Services$200,000Arts & Culture$195,000Philanthropy$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTanana Chiefs Conference: $555,174 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $335,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTOIYABE INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT: $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOVEREIGN ENERGY: $200,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetMICCOSUKEE CORPORATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIVE RENEWABLES INC: $195,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE MENOMINEE NATION: $150,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTebughna Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMary Erickson Community Housing A Non-Profit Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tanana Chiefs Conference ↗
  • Who funds UNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TOIYABE INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SOVEREIGN ENERGY ↗
  • Who funds MICCOSUKEE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE RENEWABLES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Development InstituteCO78.7× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Ndn Collective Inc · Northern California Indian Development Council Inc · Indian Land Tenure Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Wounded Warriors Family Support Inc · National Indian Health Board · National Congress of American Indians Fund · Resources Legacy Fund · National Association of Tribal Historic Officers Inc · Humboldt Area Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grid Alternatives funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grid Alternatives. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • Miccosukee Corporation: 58% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grid Alternatives’ filings →

More from the funding graph