Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gregg W Hanson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$127kEducation$59kHuman Services$46kYouth Development$29kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$2kPublic Benefit$1kHealth$900Other$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
$300
Median grant
6
States reached
$323k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLMAR ASSEMBLY OF GOD$31,100
DREAM CITY CHURCH$30,100
CONCORDIA COLLEGE$20,000
PHOENIX DREAM CENTER$10,000
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
WEST CENTRAL YOUTH FOR CHRIST$7,700
MN ADULT TEEN CHALLENGE$1,000
UNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MN$1,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL$1,000
MAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION$600
WARRIORS ASCENT GARY GEER$500
BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONS$300
Individual grant recipient$280
SALVATION ARMY$250
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DREAM CITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%DREAM CITY FOUNDATION: $198 → 11%SAFE AVENUES: $500 → 9%THE LINK: $200 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
SD
PA
CA
CO
AZ
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$256k · 15 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

$256k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+23%

Still filing today

27%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DREAM CITY CHURCH
    4× · 2020–2024 · $64k
  • WA
    WILLMAR ASSEMBLY OF GOD
    3× · 2022–2024 · $59k
  • CC
    CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $49k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +43%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
4
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
5
Colorado Christian Academy

Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…

Education
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
8
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

10
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
11
Achieve Twin Cities

As one of the upper midwest's leading career and college readiness organizations, achieve twin cities rallies community support and delivers best-in-class programs to inspire and equip young people in minneapolis and saint paul, minnesota…

Youth Development
12
Esperanza United

Esperanza united's mission is to mobilize latinas and latino communities to end domestic violence.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DREAM CITY CHURCH — $64,100 · OtherDREAM CITY CHURCHWILLMAR ASSEMBLY OF GOD — $59,100 · OtherWILLMAR ASSEMBLY OF GODCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION — $48,600 · OtherCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATIONPHOENIX DREAM CENTER — $45,000 · OtherPHOENIX DREAM CENTERWEST CENTRAL YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $22,200 · OtherWEST CENTRAL YOUTH FOR CHRISTSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Other+21 more — $18,030 · Other+21 moreUNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MN — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN OF THE PROMISE — $1,000 · InternationalHOPE IN THE NIGHT — $500 · InternationalCITY HELP FOUNDATION — $698 · Human ServicesSAFE AVENUES — $500 · Human ServicesTHE LINK — $200 · Human ServicesBEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND FOUNDATION — $300 · EducationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50 · Health
Other$267,030Philanthropy$2,000International$1,500Human Services$1,398Education$300Health$150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION — $48,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MN — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE PROMISE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HELP FOUNDATION — $698 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE IN THE NIGHT — $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE AVENUES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND FOUNDATION — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LINK — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MN
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF THE PROMISE
  • Who funds CITY HELP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOPE IN THE NIGHT
  • Who funds SAFE AVENUES
  • Who funds BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE LINK
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gregg W Hanson Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph