Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Greg and June Biggs Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2020
23
Grants FY2020
8
States reached
$101k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of Greg and June Biggs Family Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Greg and June Biggs Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 18 organizations, $211k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
20
8
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202021.

Philanthropy$258kReligion$230kYouth Development$8kInternational$6kHealth$6kEducation$5kCivil Rights$2kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k20 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DARE2SHARE MINISTRIES INTL$100,600
MIDDLECROSS CHURCH$45,200
HARBOR MINISTRIES$15,000
NEBRASKA YOUTH FOR CHRIST$5,600
KOZ INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$5,008
YFC INTERNATIONAL$5,000
PREGNANCY CENTER$4,300
NOTHWESTERN COLLEGE$4,000
LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR CONNECTION$3,480
CALIBRETE MINISTRIES$3,000
CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY ALLIANCE$2,400
SOUTHWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,000
ETHNOS 360$2,000
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP$2,000
BLAIR HEALING ROOMS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR CONNECTION: $3k → 13%LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR CONNECTION: $400 → 13%I'VE GOT A NAME: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MA
IA
CA
CO
NE
MO
TN
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$221k · 10 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$221k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+23%

Still filing today

60%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D2
    Dare 2 Share Ministries
    2× · 2020–2021 · $101k · revenue +60%
  • YF
    Youth for Christ International Ministries
    2× · 2020–2021 · $14k · revenue +6%
  • GA
    GLOBAL ASSIST
    2× · 2020–2021 · $11k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • HM
    HARBOR MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -13%
  • NY
    NEBRASKA YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • NC
    NORTHWESTERN COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

4
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
5
Dualreach

Dualreach furthers the worldwide efforts of the christian church by partnering with other ministries & churches in evangelism ministries.

Religion
6
Cbmc International Inc

Our mission is to establish and strengthen cbmc ministries at the national and regional levels across the globe as they engage the marketplace with the gospel of jesus christ and partner with men and women in transformative discipleship…

7
Across Nations

Across nations is dedicated to spreading the gospel through establishing, developing and promoting all aspects of church ministry.

Religion
8
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
9
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

10
Mike Silva Evangelism International Inc

To preach the gospel of Jesus Christ to those who have not heard and to mobilize the church to evangelism.

11
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
12
Youthfront Inc

Interdenomination ministry dedicated to bringing youth into a growing relationship with jesus christ.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Evangelism Fellowship Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ive Got a Name. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $253,770 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDDare 2 Share Ministries — $101,100 · OtherDare 2 Share MinistriesMIDDLECROSS CHURCH — $70,100 · OtherMIDDLECROSS CHURCH+11 more — $31,548 · Other+11 moreHARBOR MINISTRIES INC — $15,000 · ReligionHARBOR MI…Youth for Christ International Ministries — $14,000 · ReligionYouth for…GLOBAL ASSIST — $11,000 · ReligionGLOBAL AS…BLAIR HEALING ROOMS INC — $2,000 · Religion+2 more — $1,700 · ReligionPREGNANCY CENTER INC — $4,550 · HealthCLINIC WITH A HEART INC — $1,000 · HealthLove Your Neighborhood Connection — $3,880 · Human ServicesIVE GOT A NAME — $1,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $4,000 · EducationCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC — $2,000 · Youth Development
Community Improvement$253,770Other$202,748Religion$43,700Health$5,550Human Services$4,880Education$4,000Youth Development$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $253,770 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDare 2 Share Ministries — $101,100 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHARBOR MINISTRIES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYouth for Christ International Ministries — $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL ASSIST — $11,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER INC — $4,550 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLove Your Neighborhood Connection — $3,880 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHEAST NEBRASKA YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCBMC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIVE GOT A NAME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCLINIC WITH A HEART INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUIPNET — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greg and June Biggs Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph