Skip to content
Greenhut Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Greenhut Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$266kHousing & Shelter$86kHuman Services$83kInternational$80kYouth Development$46kEducation$31kFood & Nutrition$25kHealth$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$252k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE$80,885
GIVE LIFE NY$1,000
JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS$600
PLAY FOR PINK$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JAFCO JEWISH ADOPTION FAMILY CARE O: $180 → 7%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $600 → 13%MID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTE: $30k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
PA
CT
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$468k · 13 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$468k
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+3%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GJ
    GURWIN JEWISH GERIATRIC FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $35k · revenue +11%
  • HI
    HELPUSADOPTORG INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +719%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • GE
    GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +17%
  • MY
    MID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +20%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Jewish Life Foundation
—
3
New York Life Foundation
—
4
J Lieberman Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
5
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Migdal Ohr

Migdal Ohr means "tower of light" in Hebrew and serves as a beacon of hope to thousands of orphaned and neglected children. We serve over 10,000 children every year and raise them to become thriving, successful adults. Migdal Ohr gives…

Youth Development
7
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
The Dubin Family Foundation

Supports the mission of united jewish appeal-federation of jewish philanthropies of new york, inc., (uja-federation of new york).

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Fertility Foundation Inc

The jewish fertility foundation (jff) engages hopeful parents by providing financial assistance, emotional support, and infertility education to those struggling to build their families.

Health
11
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
12
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Michael Bolton Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Give Life Ny. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH ASSOCIATION: $231,196 · OtherUNITED JEWISH ASSOCIATIONYOUNG JEWISH PROFESSIONALS: $46,000 · OtherYOUNG JEWISH PROFESSIONALSUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY AT ALBANYRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $25,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES+20 more: $23,467 · Other+20 moreGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $75,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGLOBAL EMPOWERMEN…INTELLIHELP GLOBAL INC: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterINTELLIHELP GLOBA…+1 more: $300 · Public Safety & DisasterJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $85,885 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH ASSOCIAT…MID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN: $30,000 · Human ServicesMID-ISLAN…HELPUSADOPTORG INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHELPUSADO…+1 more: $780 · Human ServicesGURWIN JEWISH GERIATRIC FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $516 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 · InternationalDOMINIC TRIONFO MEMORIAL FUND INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsMACCABI USA INC: $1,800 · Recreation & Sports
Other$355,663Public Safety & Disaster$100,300Housing & Shelter$85,885Human Services$55,780Philanthropy$35,516International$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $85,885 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGURWIN JEWISH GERIATRIC FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTELLIHELP GLOBAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL BOLTON CHARITIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDOMINIC TRIONFO MEMORIAL FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGive Life NY: $1,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $780 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORICHES BAY PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $325 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIX HILLS FIRE DEPARTMENT: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $264 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $252 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA7.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greenhut Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greenhut Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greenhut Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home