Skip to content

· Community foundation

Greene County Foundation Inc

To create and establish a foundation to facilitate the purpose of public benefactors and to develop a plan of benefaction and maintaining a useful trust for the benefit of the public of greene county, indiana.

$861k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$298k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$274kArts & Culture$244kPublic Benefit$242kMembership Benefit$142kHealth$113kCommunity Improvement$85kHuman Services$78kReligion$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $577,374, the rows itemized in this filing. The $860,918 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $283,544 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $232k
  • $250k+1 grant · $298k
$18,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOMFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT$297,722
TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD$39,830
MSD OF SHAKAMAK$37,510
PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY - HEAD START$30,000
PASSPORTS$25,903
CITY OF JASONVILLE$24,570
LINTON-STOCKTON SCHOOL CORPORATION - WELDING PROGRAM$23,831
WAGLER EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER$18,750
PRAIRIE CHAPEL CEMETERY INC$18,600
TULIP TRESTLE COMMUNITY RESTORATION INC$12,890
SCULPTURE TRAILS OUTDOOR MUSEUM$7,500
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA$7,398
FOUR RIVERS RESOURCE SERVICES$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,710
WALNUT GROVE CEMETERY$6,710
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%FOUR RIVERS RESOURCE SERVICES: $7k → 11%INDIANA YOUTH INSTITUTE: $7k → 16%OPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%OPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $8k → 13%OPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%OPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $9k → 13%PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY - HEAD START: $30k → 13%PREGNANCY CHOICES: $21k → 13%PREGNANCY CHOICES: $20k → 13%SON MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 13%SON MINISTRIES: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 28 repeat orgs$661k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
24

Total granted

$1.4M
$264k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+49%

Still filing today

39%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $398k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREENE COUNTY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $41k · revenue +44%
  • OA
    OPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $36k · revenue +3%
  • ST
    SCULPTURE TRAILS INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • LS
    LINTON STOCKTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +49% · 33% of their budget
  • BD
    BLOOMFIELD DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2024 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

—
2
Lawrence County Industrial Development Council

To promote business development within lawrence county, illinois.

—
3
Greene County Foundation Inc

To create and establish a foundation to facilitate the purpose of public benefactors and to develop a plan of benefaction and maintaining a useful trust for the benefit of the public of greene county, indiana.

Philanthropy
4
George Ade Memorial Health Care Center Inc

To provide room, board and nursing care services for the elderly, disabled and disadvantaged as well as provide education for patients and their families and employees.

Human Services
5
Springdale Cemetery Association Inc

Care and maintenance of cemetery

Membership Benefit
6
Starke County Humane Society Inc

Animal shelter

Animals
7
Bridges to Health Inc

To provide primary care needs of the immediate household families of the medical indigent who live and/or work within grant county, indiana.

Health
8
Hope Springs Manor Inc

Hope springs manor, inc is committed to providing an assisted living facility for our community, where residents are cared for with love, dignity, andrespect.

Housing & Shelter
9
Greater Indiana Clean Cities

Our mission is to advance alternative, domestic fueled transportation, including energy-efficient technologies, across all sectors in Indiana.

Environment
10
Greater Grant County Inc

Promote business opportunities

—
11
West Central Indiana Economic Development District Inc

Economic development, elderly services and transportation planning

Community Improvement
12
Indiana University Radiology Associates Inc

Provides physician service to hospital patients and state institutions. performs related research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greene County Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metroplitan School District of Shakamak Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
10/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOOMFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT: $297,722 · OtherBLOOMFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICTCINCINNATI CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $225,430 · OtherCINCINNATI CHRISTIAN CHURCHMSD OF SHAKAMAK: $188,715 · OtherMSD OF SHAKAMAKPRAIRIE CHAPEL CEMETERY INC: $137,560 · OtherPRAIRIE CHAPEL CEMETERY INCWHITE RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $98,185 · OtherWHITE RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICTGREENE COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $63,920 · Other+37 more: $632,748 · Other+37 moreGREENE COUNTY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $41,409 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $36,129 · Human ServicesPACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSON MINISTRIES INC: $18,127 · Human ServicesFOUR RIVERS RESOURCE SERVICES INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesINDIANA YOUTH INSTITUTE INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesSHAWNEE SUMMER THEATRE OF GREENE COUNTY INC: $88,284 · Arts & CultureSCULPTURE TRAILS INC: $30,315 · Arts & CultureGreene County General Hospital Foundation: $53,140 · HealthGlenburn Home Inc: $29,700 · HealthGREENE COUNTY HEALTH INC: $17,482 · HealthREBUILT RECOVERY AND DISCIPLESHIP: $6,687 · HealthWAGLER TRAINING CENTER: $18,707 · EducationGREENE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $12,900 · AnimalsIndiana Wildlife Federation: $5,184 · AnimalsERINS PURPOSE INC: $15,343 · Religion
Other$1,644,280Human Services$139,665Arts & Culture$118,599Health$107,009Education$18,707Animals$18,084Religion$15,343

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRAIRIE CHAPEL CEMETERY INC: $137,560 over 8y, 94% of budgetSHAWNEE SUMMER THEATRE OF GREENE COUNTY INC: $88,284 over 4y, 46% of budgetGreene County General Hospital Foundation: $53,140 over 2y, 14% of budgetGREENE COUNTY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $41,409 over 2y, 11% of budgetOPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $36,129 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSCULPTURE TRAILS INC: $30,315 over 3y, 10% of budgetGlenburn Home Inc: $29,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLINTON-STOCKTON SCHOOL CORPORATION - WELDING PROGRAM: $23,831 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLINTON STOCKTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $19,566 over 1y, 33% of budgetWAGLER TRAINING CENTER: $18,707 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSON MINISTRIES INC: $18,127 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetGREENE COUNTY HEALTH INC: $17,482 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetERINS PURPOSE INC: $15,343 over 2y, 14% of budgetGREENE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $12,900 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFOUR RIVERS RESOURCE SERVICES INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA YOUTH INSTITUTE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREBUILT RECOVERY AND DISCIPLESHIP: $6,687 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetMETROPLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SHAKAMAK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,400 over 1y, 59% of budgetIndiana Wildlife Federation: $5,184 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRAIRIE CHAPEL CEMETERY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAWNEE SUMMER THEATRE OF GREENE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Greene County General Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREENE COUNTY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SCULPTURE TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds PACE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Glenburn Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds LINTON-STOCKTON SCHOOL CORPORATION - WELDING PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds LINTON STOCKTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds WAGLER TRAINING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SON MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENE COUNTY HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ERINS PURPOSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Smithville Charitable Foundation IncIN21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Regional Opportunity Initiatives Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greene County Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greene County Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greene County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph