· Community foundation
Greene County Foundation Inc
To create and establish a foundation to facilitate the purpose of public benefactors and to develop a plan of benefaction and maintaining a useful trust for the benefit of the public of greene county, indiana.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $203,385 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $551,418 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $348,033 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD | $39,800 |
| BLOOMFIELD DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION INCORPORATED | $19,300 |
| PRAIRIE CHAPEL CEMETERY INC | $18,590 |
| WHITE RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $15,225 |
| MSD OF SHAKAMAK HIGH SCHOOL | $12,420 |
| LINTON CIVITAN | $10,000 |
| GRANDVIEW CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC | $10,000 |
| CITY OF JASONVILLE | $7,810 |
| GREENE COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE | $7,220 |
| LINTON-STOCKTON BAND BOOSTERS | $7,000 |
| BLOOMFIELD CHORAL DEPARTMENT | $6,810 |
| BLOOMFIELD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH | $6,600 |
| PRIDE IN THE PARK | $6,500 |
| WALNUT GROVE CEMETERY | $6,190 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,190 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGREENE COUNTY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER2× · 2020–2021 · $41k · revenue +44%
- OAOPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC4× · 2018–2022 · $36k · revenue +3%
- STSCULPTURE TRAILS INC2× · 2019–2022 · $23k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $20k
- LSLINTON STOCKTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +49% · 33% of their budget
- WTWAGLER TRAINING CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.
To promote business development within lawrence county, illinois.
To create and establish a foundation to facilitate the purpose of public benefactors and to develop a plan of benefaction and maintaining a useful trust for the benefit of the public of greene county, indiana.
To provide room, board and nursing care services for the elderly, disabled and disadvantaged as well as provide education for patients and their families and employees.
Care and maintenance of cemetery
Animal shelter
To provide primary care needs of the immediate household families of the medical indigent who live and/or work within grant county, indiana.
Hope springs manor, inc is committed to providing an assisted living facility for our community, where residents are cared for with love, dignity, andrespect.
Our mission is to advance alternative, domestic fueled transportation, including energy-efficient technologies, across all sectors in Indiana.
Promote business opportunities
Economic development, elderly services and transportation planning
Provides physician service to hospital patients and state institutions. performs related research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greene County Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Metroplitan School District of Shakamak Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 15. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRAIRIE CHAPEL CEMETERY INC ↗
- Who funds SHAWNEE SUMMER THEATRE OF GREENE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Greene County General Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Glenburn Home Inc ↗
- Who funds SCULPTURE TRAILS INC ↗
- Who funds LINTON STOCKTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds WAGLER TRAINING CENTER ↗
- Who funds SON MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds GREENE COUNTY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds ERINS PURPOSE INC ↗
- Who funds PRIDE IN THE PARK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Regional Opportunity Initiatives Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greene County Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.