· Private foundation
Green Family Foundation Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $43k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $165k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIU FOUNDATION | $884,500 |
| ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER OF THE PERFOMING ARTS | $500,000 |
| ABCD CHARITY | $110,000 |
| PEREZ ART MUSEUM MIAMI | $55,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY | $7,000 |
| MARIAN CENTER AUXILIARY | $6,600 |
| SAINT PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH | $6,000 |
| UNITY ON THE BAY | $5,000 |
| LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| KANDELAB FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| FAU FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| THE CHILDRENS MOVEMENT OF FLORIDA | $1,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL WOMENS FORUM | $598 |
| AYITI COMMUNITY TRUST | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFANGELS FOR HUMANITY2× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +65%
- FAFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +17%
- ACAYITI COMMUNITY TRUST INC2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT FUNDone grant, 2021 · $105k
- JBJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +1%
- DIDEFENSE INTELLIGENCE MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of M-DCC is to create opportunities for economic and social transformation in our community. The vision of M-DCC envision a future where the diaspora of Black businesses thrive.
Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.
To create a greater miami where everyone can thrive by accelerating generosity, leadership, and community engagement. the miami foundation serves as a philanthropic and community backbone for greater miami, bringing together donors,…
The fiu research foundation provides means by which discoveries, inventions, processes, and work products of faculty, staff and students of the university may be patented, developed, applied and utilized in order that the results of such…
To focuses on public education and advocacy to generate public awareness of programs and services available to immigrants in Florida.
The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…
Miami freedom project for democracy (mfp for democracy), a non-partisan 501(c)3 nonprofit organization dedicated to engaging south florida's latino and immigrant communities through comprehensive civic education, leadership training, and…
Support of miami university
Nami palm beach county provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.
Unidad is a community based organization that serves as a social service, educational and cultural affairs organization on behalf of the residents of Miami Beach in service of the welfare of the entire city, with a special emphasis on the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Miami Inc and the most unlike its peers is Little River Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Miami Workers Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MARIAN CENTER SCHOOL AND SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ANGELS FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LITTLE RIVER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds DADE COUNTY MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ARTS AND CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds AYITI COMMUNITY TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPY MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FORUM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Green Family Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Green Family Foundation Trust?
Find your warmest path to Green Family Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.