Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Greater Orlando Builders Association Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Community Improvement$118kYouth Development$96kHealth$76kHuman Services$69kCrime & Legal$49kEducation$25kReligion$20kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $150
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$808k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
ELEVATE ORLANDO$22,000
EIGHT WAVES$15,000
KIWANIS CLUB$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PAVING THE WAY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$414k · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$414k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+31%

Still filing today

44%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    FLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +107%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $76k · revenue -24%
  • EF
    EMBRACE FAMILIES INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $64k · revenue -92%

Funded once

  • MP
    MICHELEE PUPPETS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +31%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WINTER PARK
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Mentoring Network Inc

Florida mentoring network empowers young people ages 13 to 25 through a proven process of growth, connection, and skill building. we believe in "trusting the process"a journey where consistent mentoring, meaningful relationships, and…

Education
2
Bridges of Light Foundation Inc

The organization was founded in 2004 to help abused, abandoned or neglected children in need, specifically children confined to foster care facilities between the ages of 6-18 in central florida. the organization provides mentors to assist…

Education
3
Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc

Pathways Early Education Center of Immokalee closes the opportunity gap by providing individualized, high-quality cognitive, social, emotional and physical education to children from birth to 5 years.

4
Florida Education and Arts Trust
Philanthropy
5
Florida Economic Consortium Inc

FEC focuses on financial literacy, job training, education, and access to essential services, helping families build a brighter future. Through workshops, seminars, one-on-one counseling, and partnerships with local organizations, we…

Community Improvement
6
Florida Press Foundation Inc

The florida press foundation is a non-profit organization affiliated with the florida press association. the foundation's mission is to create and promote lifelong educational programs that begin in elementary school promoting literacy and…

7
Artreach Orlando Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Feeding Dreams Inc

The mission of Feeding Dreams to combat childhood hunger and malnutrition that affect one in five children in Florida. Through grants, fundraising efforts, and school partnerships, we delivered 2.5 million highly nutritious meals to…

Food & Nutrition
9
Florida Learns Foundation Inc

To encourage greater professionalism, knowledge and skills among educators serving in school districts of florida through professional development, technical services, and supplemental financial support where district needs are unmet.

Education
10
Rocket Phonics Foundation Inc

Rocket Phonics Foundation assists in closing the reading achievement gap through the use of the Rocket Phonics reading program. We are a nonprofit whose current focus is literacy for 4 to 8-year-olds. For elementary students our objective…

Education
11
Florida Childrens Rights Coalition

Legal representation of children.

Community Improvement
12
Project Build Swfl

Project BUILD is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering at risk youth and young adults to be responsible, productive members of their families and communities. Our mission is to make a positive impact through the efforts of a…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Leadership Venture and the most unlike its peers is Michelee Puppets Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EMBRACE FAMILIES INC — $64,055 · OtherEMBRACE FAMILIES INCQUEST INC — $56,000 · OtherQUEST INCIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVOICES FOR OSCEOLA CHILDREN — $49,000 · OtherVOICES FOR OSCEOLA CHILDRENFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — $15,000 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH+7 more — $29,450 · Other+7 moreFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE — $95,500 · Youth DevelopmentFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENT…NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC — $76,000 · HealthNEW HOPE FOR KIDS …Eight Waves Corporation — $15,000 · EducationREED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · Education+1 more — $375 · EducationPaving the Way Foundation Inc — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$263,505Youth Development$95,500Health$76,000Education$22,875Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE — $95,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC — $76,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetEMBRACE FAMILIES INC — $64,055 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEight Waves Corporation — $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetREED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMICHELEE PUPPETS INC — $7,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPaving the Way Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFLORIDA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION INC — $375 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE
  • Who funds NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC
  • Who funds EMBRACE FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds Eight Waves Corporation
  • Who funds REED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MICHELEE PUPPETS INC
  • Who funds Paving the Way Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FLORIDA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Magruder Chesley G Fdn ImFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Magruder Chesley G Fdn Im · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greater Orlando Builders Association Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph