· Private foundation
Greater Omaha Packing Co Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $99k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOSLYN ART MUSEUM | $29,967 |
| DREAMWEAVER FOUNDATION | $19,500 |
| FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND | $15,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA | $15,000 |
| NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MEAT INSTITUTE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| 100 BLACK MEN OF OMAHA | $5,000 |
| IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER | $5,000 |
| OFFUTT ADVISORY COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| PETER MICHAEL FOUNDATION | $4,750 |
| KENT ANIMAL SHELTER | $2,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $1,500 |
| FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FBFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND4× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +136%
- OAOFFUTT ADVISORY COUNCIL2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +37%
- AIAQUA-AFRICA INC3× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- P4Partnership 4 Kids Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +49%
- PHPROJECT HARMONYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +139%
- GIGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHAone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members
One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.
Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.
The unf charitable gift fund was established to enable donors to make charitable donations to multiple organizations, including the university of nebraska.
To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.
Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northstar Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Health Clinical Operations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds PETER MICHAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Partnership 4 Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds DREAMWEAVER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OFFUTT ADVISORY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds AQUA-AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds KANEKO ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
- Who funds INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds THE JET AWARD FOUNDATION & TRUST ↗
- Who funds CUES FUND ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Giving 3 Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Omaha Packing Co Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Greater Omaha Packing Co Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Greater Omaha Packing Co Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.