Skip to content

· Private foundation

Greater Lansing Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$658k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$490k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

74% of Greater Lansing Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Capital Region Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
8
’18
9
’19
8
’20
9
’21
9
’22
10
’23
10
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$5.6MAnimals$280kHealth$250kReligion$158kEducation$128kPublic Safety & Disaster$59kHuman Services$58kCivil Rights$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $81k
  • $250k+1 grant · $490k
$8,800
Median grant
6
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$489,769
HARRY HARRIS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$23,323
CAPITAL AREA HUMANE SOCIETY$16,221
LAWRENCE AVENUE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$13,957
EDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL$13,812
HAYES-GREEN-BEACH HOSPITAL$13,672
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US$8,800
NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY$8,800
BORN FREE USA$8,800
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MI$8,800
SALVATION ARMY$8,800
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$8,800
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION$8,800
ORIGAMI REHABILITATION$7,217
WKAR-DEPARTMENT OF BROADCASTING$7,217
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Forster Woods Adult Day Services: $600 → 16%DISABILITY NETWORK CAPITAL AREA: $3k → 16%ORIGAMI REHABILITATION: $9k → 16%ORIGAMI REHABILITATION: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 24 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$1.0M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+1%

Still filing today

29%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +64%
  • EW
    EDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +40%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • I5
    IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -31%
  • CR
    CAPITOL REGION CHAPTER OF NATL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • PP
    POTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
3
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
4
Humane Farm Animal Care

Every farmer and rancher participating in the Certified Humane program had to modify their operations to meet the Animal Care Standards and be certified. Schedule O

Animals
5
Detroit Zoological Society

The mission of the Detroit Zoological Society (DZS) is to create meaningful connections between people, animals and the natural world so all can thrive. The vision of the DZS is to be a force for positive change in a world where animals…

Animals
6
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
7
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
8
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
9
Dane County Humane Society

Our mission is to foster compassionate human and animal connections; forge safe, healthy, and thriving communities for animals; provide care and transitional sheltering to animals; provide leadership and guidance to the animal sheltering…

Animals
10
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
11
Humane Society of West Michigan

Our mission is to promote the humane treatment and responsible care of animals in west michigan through education, example, placement and protection.

Animals
12
Ingham Health Plan Corporation

To act as a vehicle to provide access to organized systems of health care and improve the health status of individuals in the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital Region Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,553,999 · PhilanthropyCAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONHARRY HARRIS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $108,067 · OtherHARRY HARRI…LAWRENCE AVENUE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $90,403 · OtherLAWRENCE AV…HAYES-GREEN-BEACH HOSPITAL: $88,560 · OtherHAYES-GREEN…VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MI: $58,539 · OtherVOLUNTEERS …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $57,828 · OtherAMERICAN CA…BORN FREE USA: $57,828 · OtherBORN FREE U…THE SALVATION ARMY: $57,828 · OtherTHE SALVATI…WKAR-DEPARTMENT OF BROADCASTING: $40,463 · OtherWKAR-DEPART…FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $23,304 · Other1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $23,304 · Other+10 more: $46,938 · Other+10 moreINGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $102,390 · AnimalsNATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY: $57,828 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $57,828 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $57,828 · Animals+1 more: $4,400 · AnimalsEDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL: $79,685 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthUNIVERSITY REHABILITATION ALLIANCE INC: $15,717 · Human ServicesDISABILITY NETWORK CAPITAL AREA: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $600 · Human ServicesIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER: $5,100 · Arts & CultureLIBRARY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $3,313 · EducationDKG INTERNATIONAL EDUCATORS FOUNDATION: $920 · Education
Philanthropy$5,553,999Other$653,062Animals$280,274Health$82,185Human Services$19,317Arts & Culture$5,100Education$4,233

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,553,999 over 9y, 11% of budgetINGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $102,390 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetEDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL: $79,685 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY: $57,828 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $57,828 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $57,828 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY REHABILITATION ALLIANCE INC: $15,717 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER: $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $4,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIBRARY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $3,313 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDISABILITY NETWORK CAPITAL AREA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF LANSING: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDKG SUPPORTING CORPORATION: $925 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDKG INTERNATIONAL EDUCATORS FOUNDATION: $920 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFORSTER WOODS ADULT DAY SERVICES: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY REHABILITATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY NETWORK CAPITAL AREA ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF LANSING ↗
  • Who funds DKG SUPPORTING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DKG INTERNATIONAL EDUCATORS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FORSTER WOODS ADULT DAY SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Capital Region Community FoundationMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Capital Region Community Foundation · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Michigan Inc · Consumers Energy Foundation · Lansing Economic Area Partnership · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Lansing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Lansing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Greater Lansing Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Greater Lansing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Lansing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph