Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Greater Lansing Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$658k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$490k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

74% of Greater Lansing Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Capital Region Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
8
18
9
19
8
20
9
21
9
22
10
23
10
24
9
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$5.6MAnimals$280kHealth$250kReligion$158kEducation$128kPublic Safety & Disaster$59kHuman Services$58kCivil Rights$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $81k
  • $250k+1 grant · $490k
$8,800
Median grant
6
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$489,769
HARRY HARRIS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$23,323
CAPITAL AREA HUMANE SOCIETY$16,221
LAWRENCE AVENUE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$13,957
EDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL$13,812
HAYES-GREEN-BEACH HOSPITAL$13,672
SALVATION ARMY$8,800
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MI$8,800
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION$8,800
BORN FREE USA$8,800
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$8,800
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US$8,800
NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY$8,800
WKAR-DEPARTMENT OF BROADCASTING$7,217
ORIGAMI REHABILITATION$7,217
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Forster Woods Adult Day Services: $600 → 16%DISABILITY NETWORK CAPITAL AREA: $3k → 16%ORIGAMI REHABILITATION: $9k → 16%ORIGAMI REHABILITATION: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 24 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$1.0M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+3%

Still filing today

29%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +64%
  • EW
    EDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +40%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • I5
    IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -33%
  • CR
    CAPITOL REGION CHAPTER OF NATL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • PP
    POTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
3
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
4
Humane Farm Animal Care

Every farmer and rancher participating in the Certified Humane program had to modify their operations to meet the Animal Care Standards and be certified. Schedule O

Animals
5
Detroit Zoological Society

The mission of the Detroit Zoological Society (DZS) is to create meaningful connections between people, animals and the natural world so all can thrive. The vision of the DZS is to be a force for positive change in a world where animals…

Animals
6
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
7
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
8
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
9
Dane County Humane Society

Our mission is to foster compassionate human and animal connections; forge safe, healthy, and thriving communities for animals; provide care and transitional sheltering to animals; provide leadership and guidance to the animal sheltering…

Animals
10
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
11
Humane Society of West Michigan

Our mission is to promote the humane treatment and responsible care of animals in west michigan through education, example, placement and protection.

Animals
12
Ingham Health Plan Corporation

To act as a vehicle to provide access to organized systems of health care and improve the health status of individuals in the community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital Region Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,553,999 · PhilanthropyCAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONHARRY HARRIS SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $108,067 · OtherHARRY HARRI…LAWRENCE AVENUE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $90,403 · OtherLAWRENCE AV…HAYES-GREEN-BEACH HOSPITAL — $88,560 · OtherHAYES-GREEN…VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MI — $58,539 · OtherVOLUNTEERS …BORN FREE USA — $57,828 · OtherBORN FREE U…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $57,828 · OtherAMERICAN CA…THE SALVATION ARMY — $57,828 · OtherTHE SALVATI…WKAR-DEPARTMENT OF BROADCASTING — $40,463 · OtherWKAR-DEPART…1ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $23,304 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $23,304 · Other+10 more — $46,938 · Other+10 moreINGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $102,390 · AnimalsNATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY — $57,828 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc — $57,828 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $57,828 · Animals+1 more — $4,400 · AnimalsEDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL — $79,685 · Health+1 more — $2,500 · HealthUNIVERSITY REHABILITATION ALLIANCE INC — $15,717 · Human ServicesDISABILITY NETWORK CAPITAL AREA — $3,000 · Human Services+1 more — $600 · Human ServicesIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER — $5,100 · Arts & CultureLIBRARY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $3,313 · EducationDKG INTERNATIONAL EDUCATORS FOUNDATION — $920 · Education
Philanthropy$5,553,999Other$653,062Animals$280,274Health$82,185Human Services$19,317Arts & Culture$5,100Education$4,233

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,553,999 over 9y, 11% of budgetINGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $102,390 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetEDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL — $79,685 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY — $57,828 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $57,828 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $57,828 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY REHABILITATION ALLIANCE INC — $15,717 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER — $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $4,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIBRARY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $3,313 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDISABILITY NETWORK CAPITAL AREA — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF LANSING — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDKG SUPPORTING CORPORATION — $925 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDKG INTERNATIONAL EDUCATORS FOUNDATION — $920 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFORSTER WOODS ADULT DAY SERVICES — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds EDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL
  • Who funds NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY REHABILITATION ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER
  • Who funds POTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds LIBRARY OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DISABILITY NETWORK CAPITAL AREA
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF LANSING
  • Who funds DKG SUPPORTING CORPORATION
  • Who funds DKG INTERNATIONAL EDUCATORS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FORSTER WOODS ADULT DAY SERVICES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Capital Region Community FoundationMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Capital Region Community Foundation · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Michigan Inc · Consumers Energy Foundation · Lansing Economic Area Partnership · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greater Lansing Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Greater Lansing Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Greater Lansing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph