How much did GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE grant in FY2025?

GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE reported 31 grants totaling $662,510 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE based?

GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE is based in NH.

GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE

The corporation purpose is to (1) provide assistance to those seeking to further their education and intellectual growth (2) support programs that foster growth, education and development of members of society; especially children (3) provide financial assistance to needy or deserving members of society; especially children (4) support…

$663k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$50k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k9 grants · $63k
$10k–50k21 grants · $410k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$252k

Total assets

Largest grants

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL NH$50,000
CAREY HOUSE$35,000
LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$30,000
GOT LUNCH LACONIA$30,000
SANTA FUND OF GREATER LR$30,000
LAKES REGION COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS$30,000
BELKNAP HOUSE$25,000
LAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICE$25,000
GREATER LAKES CHILD ADVOCACY$25,000
ARCHWAYS$20,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$20,000
VOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE$16,000
NEW BEGINNINGS$15,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER$15,000
CASA NH$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $407k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.2M · 33 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.2M

$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%

+47%

Still filing today

73%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL NH
8× · 2017–2025 · $323k · revenue +251%
LR
LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
8× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +23%
GL
GREATER LAKES CHILD ADVOCACY
7× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +247%

Funded once

W
WAYPOINTgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $28k · revenue +92%
FR
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTRAL NH
one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -3%
GL
GOT LUNCH BELMONT & FRIENDS
one grant, 2024 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

New Hampshire Children's Health

Health

Children's Law Center

Provide legal representation and social services advocacy to low-income and other underserved children

Crime & Legal

Tlc Family Resource Center

Promote the optimal health and development of children, youth, and families in our region of new hampshire.

Human Services

Lakes Region Consumer Advisory Board

To provide peer support to those who are currently receiving or have received mental health services and to empower them to control their own lives and to influence the resources that affect their lives. Program support is derived…

Health

New Hampshire Lakes Association Inc

To restore and preserve the health of new hampshire's lakes.

Environment

New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits

The new hampshire center for nonprofits strengthens and gives voice to the state's nonprofit sector by providing leadership development programs, facilitating collaboration, and offering learning opportunities for nonprofit leaders, staff,…

Education

Domestic Violence Network of the Lakes Region

To provide safety and services to adults and families who have experienced Domestic Violence/Sexual Assault.

Human Services

Northeast Center for Youth and

Family and behavioral health services

Human Services

New Hampshire Children's Trust Inc

We lead the drive to ensure safe, stable, and nurturing relationships and environments for children by educating, advocating, and collaborating.

Health

Lakes Region Tourism Association

Economic development and promotion of tourism in the lakes region of new hampshire.

—

Bank of New Hampshire

Philanthropy

Early Learning New Hampshire

The furthering of quality, affordable child care services for chioldren in new hampshire

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakes Region Mental Health and the most unlike its peers is Gilford Youth Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/44

the rest of the field

165/2,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/33

Grantees still filing

25/33

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,724,750Human Services$434,000Youth Development$342,000Health$239,000Philanthropy$224,500Civil Rights$181,000Crime & Legal$155,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH53.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Granite United Way · Bank of New Hampshire · The Linden Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Women's · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · New Hampshire Children's Trust Inc · Merrimack County Savings Bank Fdtn · Cocchiaro Family Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · DCU for Kids

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SANTA FUND OF GREATER LR.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 026033605 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SANTA FUND OF GREATER LR, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 67% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Greater Lakes Region Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Greater Lakes Region Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Greater Lakes Region Charitable?

More from the funding graph

GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Greater Lakes Region Charitable?

More from the funding graph