· Private foundation
Cocchiaro Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLY TRINITY PARISH | $15,450 |
| COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SANDWICH | $14,800 |
| HARMONY WOMEN'S CARE CENTER | $10,000 |
| SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| FOREST SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| WALKWITHTIGER | $1,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL | $1,000 |
| SPEARE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | $925 |
| ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NEW ENGLAND | $500 |
| HAVEN PREGNANCY SERVICES | $500 |
| INTERLAKES ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB | $100 |
| INTERLAKES COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS INC | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHope International Ministries Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $52k · revenue +52%
- TETom Ewing Ministries Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +100%
- CPCIRCLE PROGRAM8× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $5k
- CCARENET-RIone grant, 2022 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
To foster and support the performing arts in the upper valley and lakes region of new hampshire
Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…
To strengthen new hampshire's economy and conserve natural resources by promoting a transition to clean, efficient, and renewable energy.
The organization is committed to developing each student's full intellectual, artistic and physical potential. students are encouraged to challenge themselves intellectually, to pursue rigorous learning for its own sake, (see schedule…
Concord Christian Academy is a life preparatory educational institution that works in harmony with families to promote the spiritual, intellectual, emotional, physical and creative growth of students, empowering them to live for the glory…
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire
Christian training for youth
Provides Public Library and information services to the Peacham community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spaulding Academy & Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Young Ladies Library Association of Plymouth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Hope International Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Tom Ewing Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MAYHEW ↗
- Who funds PEMI-BAKER LITERACY ↗
- Who funds SPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Speare Memorial Hospital ↗
- Who funds SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Belknap House ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds The Bridge House Inc ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET ↗
- Who funds BETSYS PARK ↗
- Who funds THE LOST CHILDREN OF PERU INC ↗
- Who funds ARTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CADY INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds GBARNGA LUTHERAN MISSION PRJCT INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CHRISTIAN RENEWAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Lovett-Woodsum Foundation Inc · Tosa Foundation · Greater Lakes Region Charitable Fund for Children Inc · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Mathieson Family Foundation · The Pamela and Laurence Tarica Foundation · The Schifrin Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cocchiaro Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Music Project Inc — 9% of income from government
- Delaware Theatre Company — 8% of income from government
- Gordon College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.