Skip to content
Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation Inc

To educate, support and advocate for the bleeding disorders community of wisconsin.

$607k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.9M
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $515,330, the rows itemized in this filing. The $607,179 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $91,849 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $335k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
$39,415
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERSITI WISCONSIN INC$68,476
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$58,580
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES$53,322
THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE$47,099
HEMOPHILIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC$46,094
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY$41,227
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$39,415
CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA$37,389
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$36,488
SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER FARGO$28,386
MAYO CLINIC$25,819
GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$20,590
SANFORD CLINIC (SIOUX FALLS)$12,445
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $56k → 9%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $65k → 11%HEMOPHILIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC: $52k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $53k → 10%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $100k → 17%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $57k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $54k → 9%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $53k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $84k → 17%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $56k → 14%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $53k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $75k → 17%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $76k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $55k → 14%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $52k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $82k → 17%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $66k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $60k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS & CLINICS OF MINNESOTA: $49k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $77k → 17%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $65k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $59k → 14%Children's Hospitals & Clinics of Minnesota: $48k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $72k → 17%Rush University Medical Center: $65k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $57k → 14%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $47k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $68k → 17%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $62k → 14%COMPREHENSIVE BLEEDING DISORDERS CENTER: $52k → 14%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $46k → 11%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $61k → 14%Comprehensive Bleeding Disorders Center: $49k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $59k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $47k → 14%Sanford Research: $51k → 9%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $69k → 11%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $54k → 14%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $56k → 11%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $54k → 14%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $53k → 11%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $52k → 11%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FAIRVIEW: $50k → 11%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $53k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $48k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $48k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 14 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$4.9M
$93k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VW
    VERSITI WISCONSIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $764k · revenue +77%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $562k · revenue +51%
  • FH
    Fairview Health Services
    9× · 2017–2025 · $461k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • S
    SANFORD
    one grant, 2017 · $51k
  • S
    SANFORD
    one grant, 2018 · $42k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
2
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
3
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
4
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Swedish Covenant Health

Swedish Covenant Health follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

—
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
Community Memorial Hospital of Menomonee Falls Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
11
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
12
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gundersen Clinic Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Hemophelia Outreach of Wisconsin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $763,649 · HealthVERSITI WISCONSIN INCRush University Medical Center: $562,337 · HealthRush University Medical CenterFairview Health Services: $461,370 · HealthFairview Health ServicesCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE: $451,585 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CAREAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $405,150 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoBLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $390,457 · HealthBLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTEMAYO CLINIC: $387,874 · HealthMAYO CLINICGundersen Clinic Ltd: $207,105 · HealthGundersen Clinic LtdUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $382,343 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONS…SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER FARGO: $255,322 · OtherSANFORD MEDICAL CENTE…SANFORD: $102,333 · OtherSANFORDCOMPREHENSIVE BLEEDING DISORDERS CENTER: $101,176 · OtherCOMPREHENSIVE BLEEDIN…Cook County Health Chicago: $86,909 · OtherCook County Health Ch…SANFORD: $51,131 · OtherSANFORD: $42,297 · OtherHEMOPHELIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC: $386,183 · EducationNorthwestern University: $372,386 · Recreation & Sports
Health$3,629,527Other$1,021,511Education$386,183Recreation & Sports$372,386

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $763,649 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $562,337 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFairview Health Services: $461,370 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE: $451,585 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $405,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $390,457 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $387,874 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEMOPHELIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC: $386,183 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetNorthwestern University: $372,386 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGundersen Clinic Ltd: $207,105 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE BLEEDING DISORDERS CENTER: $101,176 over 2y, 27% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERSITI WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Fairview Health Services ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds BLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HEMOPHELIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Gundersen Clinic Ltd ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE BLEEDING DISORDERS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hemophilia Allian…American Thrombosis a…American Cancer Socie…American Heart Associ…Sanford Health Founda…
The Hemophilia Alliance FoundationFL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation · American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Sanford Health Foundation North

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Great Lakes Hemophilia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home