Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation Inc

To educate, support and advocate for the bleeding disorders community of wisconsin.

$666k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$4.9M
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $579,072 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $665,656 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $86,584 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $283k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $297k
$41,466
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERSITI WISCONSIN INC$71,720
THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE$60,481
MAYO CLINIC$56,415
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$54,477
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$53,454
CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA$46,488
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES$41,466
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$41,179
SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER FARGO$39,824
HEMOPHILIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC$39,353
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY$38,272
GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$22,320
SANFORD CLINIC (SIOUX FALLS)$13,623
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $56k → 9%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $65k → 11%HEMOPHILIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC: $52k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY: $53k → 10%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $100k → 17%LURIE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $46k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $57k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $54k → 9%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $53k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $84k → 17%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $56k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $46k → 9%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $53k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $75k → 17%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $76k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $55k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $46k → 9%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $52k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $82k → 17%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $66k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $60k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS & CLINICS OF MINNESOTA: $49k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $77k → 17%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $65k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $59k → 14%Children's Hospitals & Clinics of Minnesota: $48k → 11%VERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $72k → 17%Rush University Medical Center: $65k → 14%THE BLEEDING AND CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $57k → 14%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $47k → 11%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $62k → 14%COMPREHENSIVE BLEEDING DISORDERS CENTER: $52k → 14%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA: $46k → 11%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $61k → 14%Comprehensive Bleeding Disorders Center: $49k → 14%Sanford Research: $51k → 9%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $69k → 11%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $54k → 14%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $56k → 11%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $54k → 14%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $52k → 11%FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FAIRVIEW: $50k → 11%University of Minnesota Fairview: $46k → 11%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $53k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $48k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $48k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.4M · 14 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$4.4M
$93k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VW
    VERSITI WISCONSIN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $695k · revenue +77%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $504k · revenue +51%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $414k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • S
    SANFORD
    one grant, 2017 · $51k
  • S
    SANFORD
    one grant, 2018 · $42k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
2
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
3
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
6
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
7
Swedish Covenant Health

Swedish Covenant Health follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
Community Memorial Hospital of Menomonee Falls Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
10
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
11
Healtheast Woodwinds Hospital

Fairview is driven to heal, discover, and educate for longer, healthier lives.

Health
12
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gundersen Clinic Ltd and the most unlike its peers is Hemophelia Outreach of Wisconsin Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VERSITI WISCONSIN INC — $695,173 · HealthVERSITI WISCONSIN INCRush University Medical Center — $503,757 · HealthRush University Medical CenterCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $414,196 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CAREFairview Health Services — $408,048 · HealthFairview Health ServicesAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $368,662 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoMAYO CLINIC — $362,055 · HealthMAYO CLINICBLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE — $343,358 · HealthBLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTEGundersen Clinic Ltd — $186,515 · HealthGundersen Clinic LtdUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITALS AND CLINICS AUTHORITY — $341,116 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONS…SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER FARGO — $226,936 · OtherSANFORD MEDICAL CENTE…COMPREHENSIVE BLEEDING DISORDERS CENTER — $101,176 · OtherCOMPREHENSIVE BLEEDIN…SANFORD — $89,888 · OtherSANFORDCook County Health Chicago — $86,909 · OtherCook County Health Ch…SANFORD — $51,131 · OtherSANFORDSANFORD — $42,297 · OtherHEMOPHELIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC — $340,089 · EducationNorthwestern University — $332,971 · Recreation & Sports
Health$3,281,764Other$939,453Education$340,089Recreation & Sports$332,971

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVERSITI WISCONSIN INC — $695,173 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $503,757 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $414,196 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFairview Health Services — $408,048 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $368,662 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $362,055 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE — $343,358 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHEMOPHELIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC — $340,089 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetNorthwestern University — $332,971 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGundersen Clinic Ltd — $186,515 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE BLEEDING DISORDERS CENTER — $101,176 over 2y, 27% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERSITI WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE
  • Who funds Fairview Health Services
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds BLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE
  • Who funds HEMOPHELIA OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds Gundersen Clinic Ltd
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE BLEEDING DISORDERS CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hemophilia Alliance FoundationFL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation · American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Sanford Health Foundation North

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Great Lakes Hemophilia Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph