Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Great Lakes Colleges Association Inc

Together we will define the future of residential liberal arts education by developing and supporting faculty and staff as institutional citizens and by offering opportunities that successfully launch students into rewarding careers.

$358k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$5.1M
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $346,379 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $358,079 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $311k
$60,025
Median grant
2
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EARLHAM COLLEGE$169,788
OBERLIN COLLEGE$81,081
OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$60,025
WABASH COLLEGE$12,727
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY$12,330
ALBION COLLEGE$10,428
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE COLLEGE: $172k → 8%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $157k → 12%ANTIOCH COLLEGE: $168k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $90k → 10%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 15%HOPE COLLEGE: $46k → 8%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $91k → 12%ANTIOCH COLLEGE: $119k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $82k → 10%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 15%HOPE COLLEGE: $38k → 8%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $62k → 12%ANTIOCH COLLEGE: $78k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $70k → 10%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $68k → 15%HOPE COLLEGE: $31k → 8%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $32k → 12%ANTIOCH COLLEGE: $56k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $62k → 10%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 15%HOPE COLLEGE: $21k → 8%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $22k → 12%ANTIOCH COLLEGE: $51k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $25k → 10%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $55k → 15%HOPE COLLEGE: $16k → 8%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $6k → 12%ANTIOCH COLLEGE: $50k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $16k → 10%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $42k → 15%HOPE COLLEGE: $11k → 8%ANTIOCH COLLEGE: $1k → 9%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $24k → 15%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $9k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$4.7M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OW
    OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $420k · revenue +53%
  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $413k · revenue +15%
  • DU
    DENISON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $405k · revenue +39%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Wilson College

    Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

    Education
    2
    Albright College

    As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

    Education
    3
    President and Trustees of Bates College

    Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

    Education
    4
    Macalester College

    Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

    Education
    5
    Augustana College

    Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

    Education
    6
    The President and Trustees of Colby College

    to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

    Education
    7
    Lehigh University

    The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

    Education
    8
    LaGrange College

    Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

    Education
    9
    Boston Architectural College

    The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

    10
    Otterbein University

    Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

    Education
    11
    Defiance College

    Defiance College graduates students to lead distinctive lives in their chosen professions through a spirit of service by preparing them to Know, To Understand, To Lead, and To Serve.

    Education
    12
    Carleton College

    See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The College of Wooster and the most unlike its peers is DePauw University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    11/13
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    ANTIOCH COLLEGE CORPORATION — $523,542 · EducationANTIOCH COLLEGE CORPORATIONEarlham College Inc — $521,583 · EducationEarlham College IncOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $420,137 · EducationOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYALLEGHENY COLLEGE — $413,360 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLEGEDENISON UNIVERSITY — $405,480 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITYALBION COLLEGE — $380,655 · EducationALBION COLLEGEKALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $368,726 · EducationKALAMAZOO COLLEGEWabash College — $364,778 · EducationWabash CollegeDePauw University — $355,466 · EducationDePauw UniversityTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER — $349,188 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTERKENYON COLLEGE — $344,244 · EducationKENYON COLLEGEHOPE COLLEGE — $334,704 · EducationHOPE COLLEGEOberlin College — $284,907 · EducationOberlin College
    Education$5,066,770

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANTIOCH COLLEGE CORPORATION — $523,542 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetEarlham College Inc — $521,583 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $420,137 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE — $413,360 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $405,480 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALBION COLLEGE — $380,655 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $368,726 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWabash College — $364,778 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDePauw University — $355,466 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER — $349,188 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE — $344,244 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE — $334,704 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOberlin College — $284,907 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds ANTIOCH COLLEGE CORPORATION
    • Who funds Earlham College Inc
    • Who funds OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE
    • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE
    • Who funds Wabash College
    • Who funds DePauw University
    • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER
    • Who funds KENYON COLLEGE
    • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE
    • Who funds Oberlin College

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Ibm International FoundationNY13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Great Lakes Colleges Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph