Skip to content

· Public charity

Great Jobs Kc Inc

The mission of great jobs kc is to provide access to college scholarships and tuition-free job training along with job placement assistance to secure family-sustaining jobs for low- to modest-income individuals in the kansas city area.

$33M
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$4.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$108MArts & Culture$564kEmployment$481kHuman Services$284kHealth$8k
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $300k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+26 grants · $30M
$170,704
Median grant
9
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-KANSAS CITY$4,518,178
CENTRIQ GROUP$2,378,750
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI$2,277,467
APEX CDL INSTITUTE$2,036,581
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS$2,003,843
ZETA COMMERCIAL DRIVING SCHOOL INC$1,975,463
MID-AMERICA COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES INC$1,808,141
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$1,717,099
JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,289,082
AVILA UNIVERSITY$1,117,504
ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY$874,002
COPPERWOOD CAPITAL LLC$871,433
MEDICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT & SUPPORT LLC$842,025
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$804,148
NEW REFLECTIONS TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$742,438
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $284k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PAWSPERITY INC: $168k → 15%PAWSPERITY INC: $116k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
CA
UT
MO
NM
KS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107M · 43 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
7

Total granted

$107M
$334k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-6%

Still filing today

37%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentHuman ServicesReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UMKC FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $20M · revenue +375%
  • RU
    ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4.2M · revenue +17%
  • AU
    AVILA UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • EE
    EMPOWERING EMPIRES
    one grant, 2024 · $149k
  • WK
    WECODE KC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -25%
  • GM
    GREENFIG MICRO EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $65k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
4
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
5
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
6
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is William Jewell College; the most unlike its peers is Seeing Yourself in Science. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
10/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $12,313,073 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIKANSAS ATHLETICS INC: $8,937,464 · OtherKANSAS ATHLETICS INCUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $8,332,569 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURIZETA COMMERCIAL DRIVING SCHOOL INC: $4,757,811 · OtherZETA COMMERCIAL DRIVING SCHOOL INCKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,818,974 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITYAPEX CDL INSTITUTE: $3,689,240 · OtherJOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3,072,072 · OtherCENTRIQ GROUP: $2,891,000 · OtherJR COLLEGE DIST OF METRO KCMO DBA MCC: $2,741,149 · OtherMID-AMERICA COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES INC: $2,524,132 · OtherNEW REFLECTIONS TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $2,320,392 · Other+34 more: $14,176,504 · Other+34 moreUMKC FOUNDATION: $20,148,722 · EducationUMKC FOUNDATIONPARK UNIVERSITY: $4,679,314 · EducationPARK UNIVERSITYROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $4,192,945 · EducationROCKHURST UNIVERSITYAVILA UNIVERSITY: $3,980,219 · EducationAVILA UNIVERSITYBAKER UNIVERSITY: $1,522,571 · Education+9 more: $4,771,475 · Education+9 moreINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $280,000 · EmploymentPER SCHOLAS INC: $165,000 · EmploymentWECODE KC: $75,000 · EmploymentRIGHTFULLY SEWN INC: $24,000 · Employment+1 more: $12,137 · EmploymentPAWSPERITY INC: $283,500 · Human ServicesJerusalem Farm: $32,500 · ReligionTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED: $8,400 · Health
Other$69,574,380Education$39,295,246Employment$556,137Human Services$283,500Religion$32,500Health$8,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUMKC FOUNDATION: $20,148,722 over 7y, 21% of budgetPARK UNIVERSITY: $4,679,314 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $4,192,945 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetAVILA UNIVERSITY: $3,980,219 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetBAKER UNIVERSITY: $1,522,571 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWGU CORPORATION: $1,223,125 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWilliam Jewell College: $1,149,390 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BUILDING CORPORATION: $700,630 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetDonnelly College: $652,775 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetGLOBAL TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION INC: $632,944 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE: $584,215 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSEEING YOURSELF IN SCIENCE: $318,763 over 3y, 92% of budgetPAWSPERITY INC: $283,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $280,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC: $92,577 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWECODE KC: $75,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJerusalem Farm: $32,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetRIGHTFULLY SEWN INC: $24,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGOODWILL OF WESTERN MISSOURI & EASTERN KANSAS: $12,137 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWGU ACADEMY: $9,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED: $8,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UMKC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AVILA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BAKER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WGU CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds William Jewell College ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BUILDING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Donnelly College ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SEEING YOURSELF IN SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds PAWSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DELORES HOMES TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ewing Marion Kauffman FoundationMO28.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Lending Help For Students Inc · Health Forward Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Jack J Isgur Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Great Jobs Kc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Great Jobs Kc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Great Jobs Kc’s filings →

More from the funding graph