Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grass Valley Ladies Relief Society

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$25kFood & Nutrition$20kHealth$7kYouth Development$6kCrime & Legal$4kEducation$4kHousing & Shelter$4kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$217k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH FOOD MINISTRY$4,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$2,550
GOLD COUNTRY SENIOR SERVICES$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ONE SOURCE EMPOWERING CG$1,500
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF THE ARTS$1,000
INTERFAITH FOOD MINISTRY$1,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF NEVADA COUNTY$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
FOOD BANK OF NEVADA COUNTY$750
Individual grant recipient$500
SIERRA SERVICES FOR THE BLIND$500
BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $3k → 11%ONE SOURCE - EMPOWERING CAREGIVERS: $2k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF THE ARTS: $1k → 11%BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $1k → 11%BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $1k → 11%ONE SOURCE-EMPOWERING CAREGIVERS: $1k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF THE ARTS: $750 → 11%BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $250 → 11%THE NORAH FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$65k · 14 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
20

Total granted

$65k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    Interfaith Food Ministry Nevada County
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +16%
  • BF
    BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +93%
  • OS
    ONE SOURCE - EMPOWERING CAREGIVERS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • GC
    GOLD COUNTRY COMM SERV-MEALS ON WHE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foothill House of Hospitality Dba Hospitality House

The mission of Hospitality House is tobring homeless people in Nevada County into a circle of community caring thatoffers shelter, sustenance, medical care, advocacy, opportunity, dignity, and hopeas we assist them in transitioning from…

Housing & Shelter
2
Nevada County Pets in Need

To serve pets in need in nevada county by providing pet food/supply vouchers, spay and neutering services, and veterinary care.

Animals
3
Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras

To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.

—
4
Sierra County Child Abuse Council

Child abuse awareness and prevention

Crime & Legal
5
Carson Valley Community Food Closet Inc

The organizations mission is to alleviate food insecurity by providing supplemental food assistance to individuals and families in need. The organization receives monetary contributions used to purchase food and accepts donated food from…

Food & Nutrition
6
Nevada Peer Support Network Inc
Health
7
United Way of Nevada County

The mission of United Way of Nevada County is to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.

—
8
Healthy Nevada
Health
9
Sierra Nevada Childrens Services

Sierra Nevada Children's Services enhances the community by supporting quality childcare and empowering families to aspire to life-long success.

Human Services
10
Gold Country Community Services

Gold Country Senior Services, Inc provides essential programs that meet the basic needs of seniors living in Western Nevada County. GCSS ensures older adults have nutritional meals, warm homes, social interaction and a greater sense of…

Human Services
11
Northern California Center for Well-Being

To improve the health and well-being of our community through evidence-based health practices and innovative programs that advance health equity for all.

Health
12
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocates of Nevada County; the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Center of the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOLD COUNTRY SENIOR SERVICES: $7,500 · OtherGOLD COUNTRY SENIOR SERVICESDONATION DAY TO LOCAL NEEDS: $7,377 · OtherDONATION DAY TO LOCAL NEEDSIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY: $4,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYONE SOURCE EMPOWERING CG: $3,000 · OtherONE SOURCE EMPOWERING CGSIERRA SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $2,700 · OtherGOLD COUNTRY COMM SERV-MEALS ON WHE: $2,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,000 · OtherCASA: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,850 · Other+15 more: $11,412 · Other+15 moreInterfaith Food Ministry Nevada County: $14,000 · Food & NutritionInterfaith Food Minis…Food Bank of Nevada County: $2,500 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of Nevada C…BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $4,750 · Human ServicesBRIGHT FUTUR…ONE SOURCE - EMPOWERING CAREGIVERS: $2,500 · Human ServicesONE SOURCE -…NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF THE ARTS: $1,750 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD…The Norah Foundation Inc: $500 · Human ServicesChild Advocates of Nevada County: $4,212 · Crime & LegalMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,550 · PhilanthropyNevada County Habitat For Humanity: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSierra College Foundation: $250 · Education
Other$51,339Food & Nutrition$16,500Human Services$9,500Crime & Legal$4,212Philanthropy$2,550Housing & Shelter$1,000Education$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInterfaith Food Ministry Nevada County: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH: $4,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChild Advocates of Nevada County: $4,212 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSIERRA SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $2,700 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE SOURCE - EMPOWERING CAREGIVERS: $2,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetFood Bank of Nevada County: $2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF THE ARTS: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNevada County Habitat For Humanity: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKARE CRISIS NURSERY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEVADA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSierra College Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Interfaith Food Ministry Nevada County ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds Child Advocates of Nevada County ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA SERVICES FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONE SOURCE - EMPOWERING CAREGIVERS ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Nevada County ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Nevada County Habitat For Humanity ↗
  • Who funds The Norah Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds KARE CRISIS NURSERY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Sierra College Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI14.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Teichert Foundation · Dignity Health · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grass Valley Ladies Relief Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grass Valley Ladies Relief Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Grass Valley Ladies Relief Society?

    Find your warmest path to Grass Valley Ladies Relief Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grass Valley Ladies Relief Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph