Skip to content

· Public charity

Grapevine giving foundation

Through the activities described above, Grapevine giving foundation will help people make more of a difference together with products and services that support collective impact accross the arts, education, community, environment and more.

$8.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
516
Grants FY2025still arriving
43
States reached
$482k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$2.9MHealth$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.1MYouth Development$947kCivil Rights$904kEducation$845kFood & Nutrition$809kCommunity Improvement$780kOther$0
02FY2025 · 516 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 516 grants below total $5,708,842, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,484,172 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,775,330 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k316 grants · $2.2M
  • $10k–50k198 grants · $2.9M
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $482k
$8,600
Median grant
43
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc$482,215
The Fountain Fund$100,000
Chicago Foundation for Women$39,064
Cities Strong Foundation$35,000
Spur Local Inc$27,758
Choc Foundation$25,750
Sophies Circle Inc$25,678
Volusia County Women Who Care Inc$25,158
G Irl$25,075
Boys and Girls Club of Utah County$25,000
Ready to Launch$25,000
Utah Children$25,000
Holding Out Help Inc$25,000
Harvest Home Inc$25,000
The Flow$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Anns Heart: $14k → 6%Beverlys PGH: $14k → 10%Judith Creed Horizons for Achieving Independence: $14k → 10%Harvest Home Inc: $25k → 14%Refuge for Women Emergency Housing: $15k → 8%Mothers Outreach Network Inc: $14k → 14%Blessing Cup of Tallahassee Inc: $19k → 19%District Council of Knoxville Society of St Vince: $15k → 12%Fresh Start Outreach Ministry Inc: $16k → 15%Jewish Family Service of Colorado Inc: $23k → 12%SANCTUARY COLLECTIVE: $16k → 15%IN HER SHOES INC: $50k → 31%TIWAHE FOUNDATION: $90k → 14%Treasure House: $15k → 11%INDIGENOUS JUSTICE: $100k → 12%Village of Hope Maui Inc: $20k → 9%My Bag My Story: $16k → 4%Chaffee County Childcare: $15k → 10%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICE: $19k → 8%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $90k → 16%Las Vegas Liberation Foundation: $15k → 13%YOUNG WOMENS FREEDOM CENTER: $15k → 10%Holding Out Help Inc: $25k → 8%Fill A Heart 4 Kids Inc: $13k → 8%1 Ohana 1 Community Inc: $22k → 12%Alive Inc: $14k → 9%The Womens Home: $17k → 16%Sunshine Place Inc: $15k → 10%OFF THE FLOOR PITTSBURGH: $15k → 11%Elder Care Services Inc: $21k → 19%FELICIAS DONATION CLOSET INC: $15k → 10%Family Promise of Juneau: $15k → 8%Bucks County Opportunity Council Inc: $16k → 6%De Moya Foundation: $14k → 15%SHINE TALLAHASSEE INC: $17k → 19%Hearts Knit Together: $17k → 8%Increasing H O P E: $19k → 12%Florence Crittenton Programs of South Carolina Inc: $18k → 12%Ready for Life Inc: $22k → 12%Cities Strong Foundation: $35k → 8%Last Mile4d: $17k → 14%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $90k → 14%SAFE MOVES FOR SENIORS: $15k → 11%Clothes to Kids Inc: $14k → 12%GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC: $14k → 14%Safe Families For Children Alliance: $22k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $35k → 14%Sounding Joy Inc: $21k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 69 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 454 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
1038

Total granted

$1.9M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+0%

Still filing today

86%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $133k · revenue +67%
  • EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $97k · revenue +4%
  • SI
    SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $94k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • WE
    WOMEN ENGAGED INC
    one grant, 2022 · $130k · revenue -48%
  • BA
    BLACKROOTS ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +28%
  • FO
    FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
2
Womenspace

Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.

Human Services
3
Safe Voices

The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…

—
4
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
5
Lydia Place

To disrupt the cycle of homelessness and nurture healing and belonging for current & future generations.

—
6
Almost Home

Almost Home empowers young moms to become self-sufficient and create a better future for themselves and their children.

—
7
Gilead House

Gilead House is a privately funded nonprofit that accepts no federal money, allowing us to remain mission driven and deeply responsive to the women and children we serve. Most of our residents are survivors of domestic violence who are…

Housing & Shelter
8
Home Start Inc

To assure the safety and resiliency of children by strengthening families and their communities.

Crime & Legal
9
The Women's Center Inc

To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.

Human Services
10
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
11
Homeworthy
Human Services
12
Foster Kinship

Foster Kinship supports all kinship families throughout Nevada. We assist grandparents, relatives, and fictive kin who are raising children through five core programs: 1- Enhanced Kinship Navigator Program - Provides intensive support to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Hope Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nannas House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1398 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1398 of the 1,581 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

23
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
251
Early backer (in before they grew)
1383/1398
Grantees still filing
630/1398
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $132,860 · Other+114 more: $3,636,328 · Other+114 moreAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $482,215 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Chari…HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $132,565 · PhilanthropyHERITAGE CLASSIC …BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $107,506 · PhilanthropyBROOKLYN COMMUNIT…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $103,343 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY …JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND: $100,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY …SPUR LOCAL INC: $87,677 · PhilanthropySPUR LOCAL INCThe Caraway Foundation: $50,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $107,623 · Philanthropy+5 moreIndigenous Justice: $100,350 · Human ServicesIndigenous Justi…EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $96,855 · Human ServicesEQUITY AND TRANS…THE TIWAHE FOUNDATION: $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE TIWAHE FOUND…THE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEW JERSEY I…IN HER SHOES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $49,643 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $42,600 · Human Services+28 more: $594,517 · Human Services+28 moreWOMEN ENGAGED INC: $130,000 · Civil RightsBLACKROOTS ALLIANCE: $125,000 · Civil RightsAction Center on Race & the Economy Institute: $90,000 · Civil RightsREPARATION EDUCATION PROJECT: $75,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $26,050 · Civil RightsUtah Children: $25,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF THE RIVER REGION: $18,235 · Civil RightsTHE FOUNTAIN FUND: $100,000 · Crime & LegalDC JUSTICE LAB: $90,000 · Crime & LegalThe Other Side Academy: $41,100 · Crime & LegalBAMA KIDS INC: $40,000 · Crime & LegalASSERVO PROJECT INC: $29,089 · Crime & LegalTURN90: $21,050 · Crime & LegalON THE WINGS OF ANGELS: $20,477 · Crime & LegalOUR SISTERS KEEPER INC: $19,700 · Crime & LegalFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $19,098 · Crime & LegalREfire Culinary Inc: $17,494 · Crime & LegalG Irl: $65,290 · Youth DevelopmentMARSHVIEW COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentHABESHA Inc: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentPick 42 Foundation: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC: $25,973 · Youth DevelopmentTeens to Trails: $23,522 · Youth DevelopmentTHE POWER COMPANY KIDS CLUB: $20,496 · Youth DevelopmentALOFT: $20,182 · Youth DevelopmentDIY GIRLS: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentRIGHT TREE: $18,700 · Youth DevelopmentHUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONS: $75,000 · InternationalTHE SHARE TRUST INC: $64,888 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC: $58,373 · InternationalPEACE DIRECT INC: $50,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $25,414 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL FUNDERS FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: $22,000 · InternationalMADRE INC: $22,000 · InternationalGroundswell International Inc: $20,349 · InternationalVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $18,528 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $18,329 · International
Other$3,769,188Philanthropy$1,170,929Human Services$1,113,965Civil Rights$489,285Crime & Legal$398,008Youth Development$379,163International$374,881

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $132,860 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $132,565 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN ENGAGED INC: $130,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBLACKROOTS ALLIANCE: $125,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES: $125,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMARIJUANA JUSTICE: $120,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $107,506 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $103,343 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndigenous Justice: $100,350 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetRICHMOND COMMUNITY TOOLBANK: $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE FOUNTAIN FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND: $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetEQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $96,855 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $94,325 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $93,722 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE MARKET STREETS DEVELOPMENT CO: $90,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE TIWAHE FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetDC JUSTICE LAB: $90,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetAction Center on Race & the Economy Institute: $90,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $90,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSPUR LOCAL INC: $87,677 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetREPARATION EDUCATION PROJECT: $75,000 over 1y, 96% of budgetCommunity Aid and Development Corp: $75,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONS: $75,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetG Irl: $65,290 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetTHE SHARE TRUST INC: $64,888 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $60,802 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $58,373 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $53,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHVIEW COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOur Childrens Earth Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetIN HER SHOES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHABESHA Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetThe Caraway Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetTHE FLOW: $50,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetPEACE DIRECT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetREADY TO LAUNCH: $50,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $49,643 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIANNES CALL: $45,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetFRESH FUTURE FARM INC: $45,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFriends of GALA: $44,993 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFULCRUM ARTS: $44,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $42,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Other Side Academy: $41,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Richard M Schulze Family FoundationMN105.7× affinity311 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Vinik Family Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Newman's Own Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Rogers Family Foundation · The Saab Family Foundation · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation · Juneau Community Foundation · Colina Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grapevine giving foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grapevine giving foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Girl Power Rocks Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Elder Care Services Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Catie's Closet Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1581 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grapevine giving’s filings →

More from the funding graph