Skip to content

· Public charity

Grand Chapter of Ohio Order of the Eastern Star Inc

The order of the eastern star is a social order comprised of persons with spiritual values.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$194kHealth$183kAnimals$66kHuman Services$44kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $69,618, the rows itemized in this filing. The $137,048 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $67,430 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$26,568
WAKE FOREST INSTITUTE FOR$18,567
4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC$12,000
DOGFACE K9S$7,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$5,483
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $7k → 14%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $15k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $12k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 5 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$303k
$197k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $151k · revenue +18%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $43k · revenue +78%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2025 · $43k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • WF
    WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +60%
  • W4
    WAGS 4 WARRIORS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • WA
    WORKING ANIMALS GIVING SERVICE FOR KIDS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center

See schedule owake forest university baptist medical center (at times also referred to as the "medical center or "wfubmc or "the filing organization") is an integral part of atrium health wake forest baptist (at times also referred to as…

Health
2
North Carolina Baptist Hospital

See schedule o for continuationnorth carolina baptist hospital (at times also referred to as the "hospital or "ncbh or "the filing organization") is an integral part of atrium health wake forest baptist (ahwfb), a preeminent learning…

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
5
WakeMed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
8
Emory University

Emory University's mission is to create, preserve, teach, and apply knowledge in the service of humanity. (See Schedule O for continuation)

Education
9
The Medical Foundation of Wake Forest University Health Sciences and North Car

See schedule oto render aid and assistance to wake forest university health sciences (wfuhs) and north carolina baptist hospital (ncbh) in their pursuits by approved methods for the promotion of medical science and medical knowledge, the…

Health
10
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
11
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
12
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shriners Hospitals for Children; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $151,234 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITYOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $42,655 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $40,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESWAGS 4 WARRIORS: $25,000 · OtherWAGS 4 WARRIORSJames Cancer Center: $17,263 · OtherJames Cancer CenterBLACK SWAMP SEARCH AND RESCUE: $15,000 · OtherBLACK SWAMP SEARCH AND R…Children's Dyslexia Centers: $12,539 · OtherChildren's Dyslexia Cent…INTERLINK MINISTRIES INC: $10,096 · OtherINTERLINK MINISTRIES INCTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $9,988 · OtherTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATIONDOGFACE K 9 S: $7,000 · OtherDOGFACE K 9 SCleveland Clinic Heart & Vascular: $6,582 · OtherCleveland Clinic Heart &…Cincinnati Children's Hospital Pediatric Heart: $6,582 · OtherCincinnati Children's Ho…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $42,879 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR…KNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FOUNDATION: $28,817 · HealthKNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FO…HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $11,521 · HealthHUMANITARIAN FOUNDATIO…OHIO EASTERN STAR HOME: $5,613 · HealthOHIO EASTERN STAR HOMEAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,420 · HealthAmerican Heart Associa…THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $5,288 · Health4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $37,000 · Human Services4 PAWS FO…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,276 · Human ServicesWOUNDED W…WORKING ANIMALS GIVING SERVICE FOR KIDS INC: $19,256 · Animals
Education$233,889Other$110,050Health$99,538Human Services$44,276Animals$19,256

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $151,234 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $42,879 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $42,655 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $37,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKNIGHTS TEMPLAR EYE FOUNDATION: $28,817 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWORKING ANIMALS GIVING SERVICE FOR KIDS INC: $19,256 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $11,521 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINTERLINK MINISTRIES INC: $10,096 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,276 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO EASTERN STAR HOME: $5,613 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $5,288 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC9.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grand Chapter of Ohio Order of the Eastern Star Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grand Chapter of Ohio Order of the Eastern Star Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grand Chapter of Ohio Order of the Eastern Star Inc?

Find your warmest path to Grand Chapter of Ohio Order of the Eastern Star Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grand Chapter of Ohio Order of the Eastern Star’s filings →

More from the funding graph