Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gracia Foundation Im

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$349kEducation$129kHuman Services$111kInternational$12kSocial Science$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$14,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RECONCILIATION MINISTRIES$37,000
NEW EUROPE VISION$17,000
BETHLEHEM BIBLE COLLEGE$14,000
International Graduate School of Leader$12,000
OXFORD CENTRE FOR MISSION STUDIES$9,000
LIGHTHOUSE WORSHIP CENTER$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($527k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($86k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW EUROPE VISION: $21k → 10%NEW EUROPE VISION: $20k → 10%NEW EUROPE VISION: $17k → 10%NEW EUROPE VISION: $17k → 10%NEW EUROPE VISION: $15k → 10%NEW EUROPE VISION: $15k → 10%NEW EUROPE VISION: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MA
CA
VA
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($86k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$40k · 4 grants
Philippines$36k · 3 grants
Peru$10k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$574k · 12 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$574k
$36k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RECONCILIATION MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $119k · revenue +20%
  • OC
    OXFORD CENTRE FOR MISSION STUDIES U
    7× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +149% · 27% of their budget
  • IL
    INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • GG
    GIGAL GOSPEL MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $24k
  • SA
    SOUTH ASIA INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SC
    SANTIAGO CONDORI TINOCO OR FELIPE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHLEHEM BIBLE COLLEGE: $92,999 · OtherBETHLEHEM BIBLE COLLEGETAFTEE (THE ASSOC FOR THEOLOGICAL: $40,000 · OtherTAFTEE (THE ASSOC FOR THEOLOGICALCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $37,500 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONALInternational Graduate School of Leader: $36,000 · OtherInternational Graduate School of LeaderGIGAL GOSPEL MISSION: $24,000 · OtherGIGAL GOSPEL MISSIONSOUTH ASIA INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $21,000 · Other+4 moreRECONCILIATION MINISTRIES: $119,000 · ReligionRECONCILIATION MINISTRIESOXFORD CENTRE FOR MISSION STUDIES U: $62,999 · ReligionOXFORD CENTRE FOR MISSION STUDIES …+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionNew Europe Vision Inc: $110,667 · Human ServicesNew Europe Vision In…FRIENDS OF SAIACS: $54,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF…HEALTH OUTREACH TO THE MIDDLE EAST FOR CHRIST: $2,000 · International
Other$261,499Religion$183,999Human Services$110,667Education$54,500International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRECONCILIATION MINISTRIES: $119,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetNew Europe Vision Inc: $110,667 over 7y, 29% of budgetOXFORD CENTRE FOR MISSION STUDIES U: $62,999 over 7y, 27% of budgetFRIENDS OF SAIACS: $54,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTributaries International Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH OUTREACH TO THE MIDDLE EAST FOR CHRIST: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RECONCILIATION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds New Europe Vision Inc ↗
  • Who funds OXFORD CENTRE FOR MISSION STUDIES U ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SAIACS ↗
  • Who funds Tributaries International Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH OUTREACH TO THE MIDDLE EAST FOR CHRIST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gracia Foundation Im funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gracia Foundation Im. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gracia Foundation Im’s filings →

    More from the funding graph