Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Grace Science Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to support and fund the development of life-saving treatment for patients that are deficient in the n-glycanese enzyme and those suffering from related genetic diseases.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$453k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Science & Tech$3.9MHealth$2.9MEducation$683kReligion$190kAnimals$142kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $352k
  • $250k+2 grants · $806k
$27,695
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$452,697
PSYCHOGENICS INC$352,945
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE$203,574
UNC CHAPEL HILL$80,637
CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES$68,025
Boston Children's Hospital$49,108
HILLTOP LAB ANIMALS INC$27,695
ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$24,241
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$23,869
PHARMARON$20,356
University of Utah$19,321
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$10,115
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$9,747
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $49k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $263k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $375k → 8%THE T DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTE: $132k → 10%CALIBR: $133k → 11%NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC: $158k → 17%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $49k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $279k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $453k → 16%UNC CHAPEL HILL: $81k → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $48k → 19%PSYCHOGENICS INC: $353k → 7%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $58k → 22%THE JACKSON LABORATORY: $168k → 11%CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES: $516k → 8%Boston Children's Hospital: $49k → 16%PERLARA PBC: $100k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $350k → 8%SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES: $124k → 11%NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC: $55k → 17%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $204k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $178k → 16%UNC CHAPEL HILL: $47k → 13%PSYCHOGENICS INC: $233k → 7%THE JACKSON LABORATORY: $50k → 11%CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES: $308k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%PERLARA PBC: $90k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $268k → 8%SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES: $124k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN: $142k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $152k → 16%CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES: $298k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $79k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $107k → 8%SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES: $83k → 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $139k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $65k → 16%CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES: $68k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $57k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $84k → 8%CALIBR: $44k → 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $114k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $51k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $51k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $58k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $72k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $72k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 21% of Grace Science Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Grace Science Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.1M · 20 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
11

Total granted

$5.1M
$639k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+96%

Still filing today

25%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $546k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    6× · 2017–2024 · $924k · revenue +67%
  • TS
    The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
    3× · 2018–2020 · $331k · revenue +27%
  • TJ
    THE JACKSON LABORATORY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $218k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • PI
    PSYCHOGENICS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $233k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN
    one grant, 2021 · $142k
  • TJ
    THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES
    one grant, 2022 · $132k · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
7
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
8
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Salk Institute for Biological Studies and the most unlike its peers is Virginia Commonwealth University Foundat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES — $1,136,772 · OtherCHARLES RIVER LABORATORIESTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $626,392 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTEPSYCHOGENICS INC — $352,945 · OtherPSYCHOGENICS INCMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $287,553 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $253,215 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTEPSYCHOGENICS INC — $233,245 · OtherPSYCHOGENICS INCPERLARA PBC — $190,000 · OtherCALIBR — $177,830 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN — $141,560 · Other+20 more — $844,397 · Other+20 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,528,311 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND …Baylor College of Medicine — $924,361 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine+2 more — $42,268 · EducationNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $255,000 · HealthNEW YORK S…THE JACKSON LABORATORY — $217,533 · HealthTHE JACKSO…THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES — $132,178 · HealthTHE J DAVI…Children's Hospital Corporation — $98,218 · HealthChildren's…The Broad Institute Inc — $39,050 · Health+1 more — $16,500 · HealthThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $331,241 · Science & Tech
Other$4,243,909Education$2,494,940Health$758,479Science & Tech$331,241

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,528,311 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $924,361 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $331,241 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $255,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY — $217,533 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES — $132,178 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $98,218 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $39,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine — $24,241 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT — $18,027 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
  • Who funds NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY
  • Who funds THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc
  • Who funds Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • Who funds VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT
  • Who funds STANFORD HEALTH CARE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN10.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Grace Science Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • The Broad Institute Inc19% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grace Science Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Grace Science Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph