Skip to content
Grace M Harvie Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Grace M Harvie Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$28kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$19kEducation$11kYouth Development$8kAnimals$3kRecreation & Sports$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$244k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BEECHWOOD HOME$2,500
DCCH CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILI$2,500
CAMP JOY$2,500
BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER$2,000
THE CARNEGIE THEATRE$1,000
ADVENTURE CREW$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LADD: $2k → 16%LADD: $1k → 16%BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER: $2k → 16%BEECH ACRES: $2k → 16%MAPLE KNOLL: $2k → 16%THEIR VOICE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$57k · 12 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$57k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+3%

Still filing today

67%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    EAST END ADULT EDUCATION CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +33%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +27%
  • OM
    OVER-THE-RHINE MUSEUM
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +243%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BARN (WAC CULTURAL CENTER)
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +120%
  • SC
    SHRINERS CHILDRENS OHIO
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Living Quaker Heights

To provide older adults with caring and quality services toward the enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well being consistent with the christian gospel.

—
2
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
3
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
4
Ohio Living Communities

See schedule oohio living communities was founded in 1922 and was incorporated as an ohio non-profit corporation in 1959. the corporation's mission statement is as follows:our mission is to provide older adults with caring and quality…

Human Services
5
Mcv Health Care Facilities Inc

See schedule othe mission of christian village communities is to guide older adults to joyful and purposeful life experiences in a faith-filled community.care is the heart and soul of everything we do. we are devoted to maintaining the…

Health
6
Blanchard Valley Continuing Care Services

Our mission: our extraordinary people provide caring for a lifetime through a broad continuum of exceptional health-related services in northwest ohio.

Housing & Shelter
7
Mccullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Incorporated

Acute care hospital facility delivering quality services to our patients and the communities we serve.

Health
8
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
9
Otterbein Portage Valley Inc

Inspired by faith, we strive to enrich individual life journeys for all.

—
10
Church of the Brethren Home Inc

To be an innovative, collaborative and trustworthy resource that enables adults to experience aging with peace of mind.

Human Services
11
Cincinnati's Optimum Residential Environments Inc

Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities

Health
12
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Their Voice of Greater Cincinnati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAST END ADULT EDUCATION CENTER: $10,500 · OtherEAST END ADULT EDUCATION CENTERPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $7,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODTHE BARN (WAC CULTURAL CENTER): $7,500 · OtherTHE BARN (WAC CULTURAL CENTER)BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD: $6,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARDKNOW THEATRE: $5,500 · OtherKNOW THEATRESHRINERS CHILDRENS OHIO: $4,000 · OtherSHRINERS CHILDRENS OHIOIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · Other1N5: $2,500 · OtherCAMP JOY: $2,500 · OtherDCCH CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILI: $2,500 · OtherFEATHER LINK INC: $2,500 · OtherWACC FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherYWCA: $2,500 · Other+5 more: $8,500 · Other+5 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITAL…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPIT…BEECHWOOD HOME: $3,500 · HealthBEECHWOOD HOMETHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthTHE DRAGONFLY FOU…BEECH ACRES: $4,000 · Human ServicesBEECH ACRE…Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesLiving Arr…Their Voice of Greater Cincinnati: $1,500 · Human ServicesTheir Voic…MAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesMAPLE KNOL…OVER-THE-RHINE MUSEUM: $4,500 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR OHIO RIVER EDUCATION: $1,500 · EnvironmentADVENTURE CREW: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentWesley Community Center Inc: $500 · Education
Other$68,000Health$15,500Human Services$9,500Arts & Culture$4,500Environment$1,500Youth Development$1,000Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAST END ADULT EDUCATION CENTER: $10,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD: $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOVER-THE-RHINE MUSEUM: $4,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBEECH ACRES: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEECHWOOD HOME: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHYDE PARK MULTI-SERVICE CENTER FOR OLDER ADULTS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTheir Voice of Greater Cincinnati: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR OHIO RIVER EDUCATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWesley Community Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnat…Robert a & Marian K K…Louise Taft Semple Fo…J Frederick & Helen B…L & L Nippert Charita…Sutphin Family Founda…The Thomas J Emery Me…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Helen E Allen Charita…Charles Scott Riley I…Agnes Nordloh Charita…The Wohlgemuth Hersch…
The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH22.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · J Frederick & Helen B Vogel Trust · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Helen E Allen Charitable Foundation · Charles Scott Riley III Foundation · Agnes Nordloh Charitable Trust · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank Na Agent

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grace M Harvie Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grace M Harvie Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grace M Harvie Trust?

Find your warmest path to Grace M Harvie Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grace M Harvie’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home