Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goulet Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$30kEducation$17kAnimals$5kHealth$3kFood & Nutrition$1kInternational$500Recreation & Sports$300Environment$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$331k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HOPE MEDIA GROUP$1,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$750
MCKAMY MIDDLE SCHOOL$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$450
0SE PTA$259
Individual grant recipient$258
Individual grant recipient$250
DIAPER BANK$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KLOVE: $750 → 6%VOICE FOR CHOICE: $1k → 8%CCC HUMANE: $500 → 9%SLAVE 2 NOTHING: $250 → 10%ENCINITAS SOCCER LEAGUE: $300 → 11%JCS MOUNTAIN OAKS PTO: $250 → 12%TPIRC: $263 → 14%ROCKPOINT CHURCH: $1k → 8%DIAPER BANK: $250 → 16%HOPE MEDIA GROUP: $1k → 16%HEALTH FREEDOM INSTITUTE: $250 → 14%OUR DAILY BREAD: $250 → 11%CONVOY OF HOPE: $750 → 15%SAMARATINS PURSE: $250 → 21%PRISON FELLOWSHIP: $250 → 4%FARE: $250 → 6%CRAZY4PAWZ: $250 → 13%KLOVE: $750 → 6%VOICE FOR CHOICE: $500 → 8%CCC HUMANE: $500 → 9%CALVARY CHAPEL: $8k → 11%JCS MOUNTAIN OAKS PTO: $250 → 12%0SE PTA: $518 → 8%SAMARATINS PURSE: $250 → 21%FARE: $250 → 6%KLOVE: $500 → 6%CALVARY CHAPEL: $4k → 11%MCKAMY MIDDLE SCHOOL: $500 → 8%CALVARY CHAPEL: $3k → 11%OLD SETTLERS ELEMENTARY: $500 → 8%FMHS PTSA: $260 → 8%MARA RESCUE: $2k → 11%0SE PTA: $259 → 8%MARA RESCUE: $500 → 11%MCKAMY PTA: $258 → 8%FRIDAY NGHT LIGHTS FOOTBALL: $260 → 11%Joe Colston: $500 → 11%Grace of Calvary: $5k → 11%SAND AND STRAW FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%ST ANDREWS CHURCH: $4k → 11%ST ANDREWS CHURCH: $3k → 11%ST ANDREWS CHURCH: $3k → 11%ST ANDREWS CHURCH: $2k → 11%PLC SOFIA SCHOOL: $750 → 11%PAUL ECKY ELEMENTARY: $750 → 11%PEC PTA: $500 → 11%THRIVE LEARNING CENTER: $500 → 11%JCS MOUNTAIN OAKS PTO: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NV
CA
MO
VA
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 16 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +78% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
20

Total granted

$44k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+78%

Still filing today

25%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionAnimalsHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AV
    A Voice for Choice Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +88%
  • TL
    Thrive Learning Centers
    2× · 2022–2023 · $750 · revenue +25%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2021–2024 · $500 · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROCKPOINT CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $750
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
2
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
3
Explore God Network
—
4
Hope for the Heart
—
5
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
6
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
7
Voice in the Wilderness Missions in
Arts & Culture
8
Praise Broadcasting Inc

Praise broadcasting's (praisefm) vision is to see every tribe and nation experiencing jesus together. our mission is simple: together we help people discover and worship jesus. more than a radio station, praisefm is a place where…

Religion
9
Signs & Wonders Ministries
—
10
Choose Life Radio Network

To encourage and educate from a biblical worldview, utilizing the written and spoken word, focusing on the sanctity of human life from conception.

Arts & Culture
11
Speak Life Community Church

Religious Organization

Religion
12
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Mara Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALVARY CHAPEL: $14,790 · OtherCALVARY CHAPELST ANDREWS CHURCH: $11,818 · OtherST ANDREWS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,250 · OtherKLOVE: $2,250 · Other+28 more: $15,299 · Other+28 moreMARA RESCUE: $2,250 · AnimalsRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 · AnimalsA Voice for Choice Inc: $1,500 · HealthThrive Learning Centers: $750 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 · ReligionRBC MINISTRIES: $250 · ReligionHOPE MEDIA GROUP: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCONVOY OF HOPE: $750 · InternationalENCINITAS SOCCER LEAGUE: $300 · Recreation & SportsLet Them Breathe: $250 · Human Services
Other$51,407Animals$2,500Health$1,500Religion$1,500Arts & Culture$1,000International$750Recreation & Sports$300Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARA RESCUE: $2,250 over 3y, 14% of budgetA Voice for Choice Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE MEDIA GROUP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThrive Learning Centers: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENCINITAS SOCCER LEAGUE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLet Them Breathe: $250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARA RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds A Voice for Choice Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE MEDIA GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Thrive Learning Centers ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds ENCINITAS SOCCER LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Let Them Breathe ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goulet Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goulet Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Goulet Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph