Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gottlieb Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$69kHealth$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kPhilanthropy$12kHuman Services$10kReligion$9kInternational$8kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$303k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION$17,900
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK$5,000
BEACH TERRACE PARK$5,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$5,000
CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION PALM BEACH$4,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER$2,500
PANCREATIC CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,120
AMERICAN FRIENDS MORGAN DAVID$1,000
AFIKIM FOUNDATION$1,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$700
FRENCHMAN CHARITY$700
AJ FOUNDATION$300
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PHILLY HOUSE: $160 → 10%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $1k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $500 → 22%PROJECT HOME: $300 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
AR
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 27 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
18

Total granted

$125k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
0%

Still filing today

30%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalReligionHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TRANSPLANT HOUSE
    3× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +48%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +20%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CG
    CAROLE GOTTLIEB ELM GRDEN
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -40%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.

Health
3
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
4
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
5
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
6
Chelsea Jewish Green House Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals and families throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing and rehabilitation, and assisted living care without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to…

Health
7
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
8
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
9
Chelsea Jewish North Shore Assisted Living Inc

To enrich the life of each of our residents and program participants so that each may continue to live his or her life with a sense of meaning and purpose. we provide assisted living units for our tenants.

Housing & Shelter
10
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
11
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
12
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Matthew P Pellegrino Ii Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAROLE GOTTLIEB ELM GRDEN: $50,000 · OtherCAROLE GOTTLIEB ELM GRDENIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $21,415 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INCABRAMSON CENTER: $9,250 · OtherABRAMSON CENTERJEWISH FEDERATION PALM BEACH: $6,380 · Other+35 more: $27,284 · Other+35 moreTRANSPLANT HOUSE: $7,500 · HealthTRANSPLANT H…Jupiter Medical Center Inc: $7,500 · HealthJupiter Medi…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 · HealthTHE CHILDREN…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $2,500 · HealthPANCREATIC C…INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $17,900 · Arts & CultureINSIGHT T…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,800 · International+2 more: $300 · InternationalBETHEL OF TRUTH CHURCH: $7,700 · ReligionTHE AFIKIM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterBEACH TERRACE PARK INC: $5,000 · Environment
Other$146,829Health$25,000Arts & Culture$17,900International$12,100Religion$8,800Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $17,900 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL OF TRUTH CHURCH: $7,700 over 3y, 11% of budgetTRANSPLANT HOUSE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEACH TERRACE PARK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $3,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATTHEW P PELLEGRINO II MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $375 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVERFORD SCHOOL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLINIC FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL OF TRUTH CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds TRANSPLANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACH TERRACE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE AFIKIM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW P PELLEGRINO II MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gottlieb Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gottlieb Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gottlieb Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph