Skip to content
Gosin Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gosin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$613k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$417k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$594kHealth$68kPublic Benefit$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kEducation$25kRecreation & Sports$12kFood & Nutrition$3k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
  • $250k+1 grant · $417k
$60,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 97% of reported assets are held in Newmark Group Inc Class A.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTS 14C A$416,664
FOUNTAIN HOUSE BRONX$120,000
FENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC$60,000
KATHARINE HEPBURN CULTURAL ARTS CENTER$15,000
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$1,535
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%FENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC: $60k → 7%COUNTRY ARK FARM: $3k → 9%PARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%BYRAM HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%NEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS & LEARNING: $12k → 13%THE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND: $50k → 17%KATHARINE HEPBURN CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: $15k → 7%CTNNB1 CONNECT AND CURE: $1k → 4%ARTS 14C A: $417k → 14%FENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC: $5k → 7%NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL: $25k → 6%FRIENDS OF KAREN: $10k → 9%FOUNTAIN HOUSE BRONX: $120k → 17%KATHARINE HEPBURN CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: $5k → 7%FRIENDS OF KAREN: $5k → 9%FOUNTAIN HOUSE BRONX: $25k → 17%THE KATHARINE HEPBURN CULTURAL ARTS CENTER INC: $12k → 7%NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL: $10k → 9%NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Gosin Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 12% of the giving stays in CT; by stated purpose, 0%.

Gosin Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$297k · 5 repeat orgs$519k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$297k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-17%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $418k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $65k · revenue +337%
  • NW
    NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +23%
  • TK
    The Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -17%
  • BH
    BYRAM HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +26%
  • NY
    NEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS & LEARNING
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
2
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
3
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
4
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
5
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
6
Plainview Hospital

Plainview hospital is part of northwell health, inc ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
7
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
8
Glen Cove Hospital

Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…

Health
9
John T Mather Memorial Hospital

John t. mather memorial hospital ("mather") is a non-profit community hospital that is part of northwell health. mather strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical…

Health
10
Huntington Hospital Association

Huntington hospital association's ("hospital") mission is to provide a full range of inpatient, outpatient and specialized healthcare services, regardless of a patient's ability to pay, within an environment nurtured by respect and safety.…

Health
11
Central Suffolk Hospital

Central suffolk hospital ("csh") d/b/a peconic bay medical center ("pbmc") is a not-for-profit hospital consisting of acute health care, a skilled nursing facility and a certified home care agency. csh provides a full range of health care…

Health
12
Staten Island University Hospital

Staten island university hospital is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARTS 14C A: $416,664 · OtherARTS 14C AFOUNTAIN HOUSE BRONX: $145,000 · OtherFOUNTAIN HOUSE BRONX+2 more: $14,500 · OtherNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · HealthNORTHERN …FRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $15,000 · HealthFRIENDS O…PARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthPARKER JE…+2 more: $2,535 · HealthFENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC: $65,000 · PhilanthropyFENWICK I…THE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterThe Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center Inc: $32,200 · Arts & CultureBYRAM HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Education
Other$576,164Health$67,535Philanthropy$65,000Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Arts & Culture$32,200Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFENWICK IMPROVEMENT FUND INC: $65,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetTHE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center Inc: $32,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBYRAM HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNTRY ARK FARMS: $2,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,535 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCTNNB1 Connect and Cure Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gosin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gosin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gosin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home