Skip to content
Goshen Hospital Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Goshen Hospital Association Inc

The mission of Goshen Hospital is to improve the health of our communities by providing innovative, outstanding care and service, through exceptional people doing exceptional work.

$27M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$27M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$136MYouth Development$211kHuman Services$111kEducation$91kArts & Culture$30k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$26,602,920
Median grant
1
States reached
$413M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Goshen Health System Inc$26,602,920
Goshen Health Foundation Inc$358,590
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Family Christian Development Center: $9k → 13%FAMILY CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $8k → 13%Family Christian Development Center: $6k → 13%Bashor Home of the UMC Inc: $9k → 13%BASHOR HOME OF THE UMC INC: $8k → 13%Bashor Home of the UMC Inc: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$136M · 15 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$136M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+19%

Still filing today

93%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    Goshen Health System Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $133M · revenue +33% · 37% of their budget
  • MC
    MAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $440k · revenue +133%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $206k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • GT
    GOSHEN THEATER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -76%
  • GC
    Goshen College Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +39%
  • GC
    GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
2
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
3
Northern Oswego County Health Services Inc

To provide the community with quality healthcare and promote the wellness of the community.

Health
4
Echo Community Health Care Inc

We provide quality healthcare to all members of our community, including the uninsured, underinsured and homeless. Our comprehensive services are Affordable, Accessible and Appropriate. Our team of professionals is here to care for you and…

—
5
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
6
Oak Orchard Community Health Centerinc

To cultivate patient-centered health and wellness by providing engaged and innovative health care for our community.

Health
7
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
8
Elkhart General Hospital Inc

We deliver outstanding care, inspire health, and connect with heart.

Health
9
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
10
Christian Healthcare Centers Inc

Christian Healthcare Centers provides affordable, quality and comprehensive healthcare services to the body of Christ and the community.

Health
11
Christian Health Care Center

Christian Health Care Center is a skilled nursing facility which provides housing services designed to meet the needs of older residents of Lynden Washington regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
12
Goshen Help

Improve the quality of life for people in need by empowering them to become more self sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Council On Aging of Elkhart County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Horizon Education Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Goshen Health System Inc: $133,374,857 · HealthGoshen Health System Inc+5 more: $1,884,324 · HealthMAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $440,000 · OtherCENTER FOR HEALING AND HOPE: $56,573 · OtherCOUNCIL ON AGING OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $50,250 · OtherCARE FOUNDATION INC: $35,200 · Other+4 more: $21,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $205,700 · Youth DevelopmentHORIZON EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $70,000 · EducationGoshen College Inc: $15,000 · EducationFAMILY CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $22,850 · Human ServicesBashor Home of The United Methodist Church Inc: $21,550 · Human ServicesGOSHEN THEATER INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC: $11,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$135,259,181Other$603,023Youth Development$205,700Education$85,000Human Services$44,400Arts & Culture$30,000Crime & Legal$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGoshen Health System Inc: $133,374,857 over 5y, 37% of budgetGoshen Health Foundation Inc: $1,607,399 over 5y, 55% of budgetMAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $440,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $205,700 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA HISPANIC HEALTH COALITION INC: $170,075 over 3y, 17% of budgetHORIZON EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $70,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALING AND HOPE: $56,573 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $50,250 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCANCER RESOURCES FOR ELKHART COUNTY INC: $47,550 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetOAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC: $30,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOSHEN THEATER INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetELKHART COUNTY CLUBHOUSE INC: $29,050 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFAMILY CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $22,850 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetBashor Home of The United Methodist Church Inc: $21,550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGoshen College Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMENNONITE DISABILITIES COMMITTEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Crossroads United Way…Welter Foundation IncLilly Endowment IncElkhart General Hospi…Irions Foundation IncBill Deputy Foundation1st Source Bank Found…Feed the Children IncRenaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…
Community Foundation of Elkhart County IncIN34.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Crossroads United Way Inc · Welter Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Elkhart General Hospital Inc · Irions Foundation Inc · Bill Deputy Foundation · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Feed the Children Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goshen Hospital Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goshen Hospital Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Goshen Hospital Association Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Goshen Hospital Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Goshen Hospital Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home