Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gordon Generation Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$44kPhilanthropy$33kReligion$32kEnvironment$20kCivil Rights$19kEmployment$7kArts & Culture$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$320k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$17,100
JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY$5,000
NATL JEWISH HEALTH$5,000
UNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE$3,382
SEA & SAGE AUDUBON SOCIET$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LAMBDA LEGAL$2,000
LARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL CTR$2,000
UNIV OF CA USC SHOAH FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,073
Individual grant recipient$45
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELA: $5k → 10%PBS SOCAL KCET: $2k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5k → 11%TEMPLE ISIAH: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE: $5k → 14%SWEET ADELINES INT'L: $17k → 15%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%LARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL CTR: $3k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELA: $5k → 10%PBS SOCAL KCET: $2k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5k → 11%THE CENTER: $3k → 11%LAMBDA LEGAL: $3k → 14%SWEET ADELINES INT'L: $5k → 15%LARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL: $3k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELA: $5k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $4k → 11%LAMBDA LEGAL: $3k → 14%SWEET ADELINES INT'L: $5k → 15%LARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL: $3k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELA: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE: $3k → 10%TEMPLE BETH EL RIVERSIDE: $4k → 11%LAMBDA LEGAL: $3k → 14%SWEET ADELINES INT'L: $5k → 15%LARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL: $3k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE: $3k → 10%TEMPLE BETH EL RIVERSIDE: $3k → 11%LAMBDA LEGAL: $3k → 14%SWEET ADELINES INT'L: $5k → 15%LARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL CTR: $2k → 12%HARBORLITES CHORUS: $2k → 10%TEMPLE BETH EL RIVERSIDE: $3k → 11%LAMBDA LEGAL: $3k → 14%SWEET ADELINES INT'L: $5k → 15%LARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL CTR: $2k → 12%UNIV OF CA USC SHOAH FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%THE OVERTONE SOCIETY: $3k → 15%NATL JEWISH HEALTH: $8k → 12%LAMBDA LEGAL: $2k → 14%NATL JEWISH HEALTH: $8k → 12%NATL JEWISH HEALTH: $5k → 12%NATL JEWISH HEALTH: $5k → 12%NATL JEWISH HEALTH: $5k → 12%NATL JEWISH HEALTH: $5k → 12%NATL JEWISH HEALTH: $5k → 12%NATL JEWISH HEALTH: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$202k · 14 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$202k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-40%

Still filing today

21%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +50%
  • SS
    Sea & Sage Audubon Society
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • LL
    LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +196%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -40%
  • TI
    TEMPLE ISIAH
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $42,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FEDERATION OF DELA: $16,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAUNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE: $11,702 · OtherUNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUETEMPLE BETH EL RIVERSIDE: $9,550 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EL RIVERSIDEUNIV OF CA USC SHOAH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherUNIV OF CA USC SHOAH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL CTR: $7,000 · OtherLARADON TRAINING & RESIDENTIAL CTRIndividual grant recipient: $5,073 · OtherTHE OVERTONE SOCIETY: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,165 · Other+4 more: $8,645 · Other+4 moreNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $43,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALT…Sea & Sage Audubon Society: $19,900 · EnvironmentSea & Sag…LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $19,000 · Civil RightsLAMBDA LE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $14,000 · PhilanthropyWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,500 · International
Other$124,735Health$43,500Environment$19,900Civil Rights$19,000Philanthropy$14,000International$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $43,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSea & Sage Audubon Society: $19,900 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Sea & Sage Audubon Society ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gordon Generation Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gordon Generation Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Jewish Federation of Delaware Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gordon Generation’s filings →

More from the funding graph