How much does Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation give?

Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation reported 28 grants totaling $43,270 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 32 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (64%), Health (17%), Religion (6%).

Who are Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc ($26k), Jewish Senior Life ($6k), Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc ($5k).

Does Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 69% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Rochester Area Community Foundation, Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation, William & Sheila Konar Foundation.

Where is Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation based?

Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation is based in NY.

Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation

Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$15k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$141kHealth$38kReligion$13kEnvironment$12kHuman Services$4kEducation$4kInternational$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0

02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k26 grants · $18k
$10k–50k2 grants · $26k

$180

Median grant

States reached

$374k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Planned Parenthood of America	$15,000
Jewish Federation of Greater Rochester	$10,720
Planned Parenthood of Massachusetts	$5,000
Temple B'rith Kodesh	$3,255
Individual grant recipient	$3,000
Jewish Home Foundation	$1,500
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute	$1,500
TemPro	$360
70 Faces Media	$360
Needham Community Council	$300
Finger Lakes Regional Burn Association (FLRBA)	$254
MCC Foundation	$200
Mass Breast Cancer Coalition	$200
American Jewish Committee (AJC)	$180
The Little Theatre	$180

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $480) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 71%.

Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)

How this is measured

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$172k · 28 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$172k

$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%

Still filing today

50%

37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $903 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthInternationalArts & CultureEducationReligionHuman ServicesOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
8× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +12%
JS
JEWISH SENIOR LIFE
6× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +11%
PP
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +11%

Funded once

JF
JEWISH FEDERATION OF ROCHESTER
one grant, 2017 · $18k
IL
Imagination Library
one grant, 2024 · $3k
HS
HILLEL SCHOOL INC
one grant, 2021 · $1k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights

Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health

The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture

Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech

Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy

Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy

The Jerusalem Connection

—

National Jewish Policy Center

To conduct educational activities and to provide scholarly perspectives on foreign and domestic policies that impact the jewish community in the united states and the broader american public.

International

Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy

Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington

As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…

Community Improvement

New Jewish Narrative Inc

To support a strong and secure israel and to carry out public information activities on the middle east peace issues in the united states.

International

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of Greater Rochester Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/29

Grantees still filing

13/29

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$151,009Health$33,538Philanthropy$23,238Religion$6,200International$3,390Arts & Culture$1,738Human Services$480

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Community FoundationNY26.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · Louis S & Molly B Wolk Foundation · Michael and Deborah Gordon Charitable Foundation Inc · Ames-Amzalak Memorial Trust · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · John Edward Lovenheim and Barbara Pitlick Lovenheim Charitable Trust · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · The Louise and Henry Epstein Family Foundation Inc · CornellWeinstein Family Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gordon & Marjorie Present Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Gordon & Marjorie Present’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home