Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goodall Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$256kEducation$199kArts & Culture$188kYouth Development$45kCommunity Improvement$31kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$9kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VENTURA BOTANICAL GARDENS$62,500
CA NATURE MUSEUM$20,000
THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION CALIFORNI$10,000
CENTER FOR NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP$5,000
LISTEN4GOOD$4,000
MUSEUM OF VENTURA COUNTY$2,500
BELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION$600
ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SMITH COLLEGE: $3k → 12%LIVINGSTON MEMORIAL: $5k → 10%SPORTING CALIFORNIA INC: $3k → 14%USC LIBRARIES: $3k → 14%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HIS: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION CSU CHICO: $15k → 18%CANDIDORG: $13k → 17%GUIDE STAR: $7k → 14%USS INDIANPOLISGWINN ANGEL SCHOLARS: $5k → 7%USS INDIANAPOLIS CA-35 LEGACY ORGAN: $7k → 12%LISTEN4GOOD: $4k → 9%ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 14%USS INDIANAPOLIS SURVIVORS ORGANIZA: $5k → 19%MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY REINSCH LIBRAR: $3k → 7%LIVINGSTON MEMORIAL: $4k → 10%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HIS: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION CSU CHICO: $15k → 18%CANDIDORG: $9k → 17%GUIDE STAR: $6k → 14%USS INDIANAPOLIS CA-35 LEGACY ORGAN: $5k → 12%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HIS: $10k → 14%CSU CHICO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%GUIDESTAR: $4k → 14%USS INDIANAPOLIS CA-35 LEGACY ORGAN: $4k → 12%KID STREAM: $3k → 10%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HIS: $10k → 14%CSU CHICO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%GUIDESTAR: $3k → 14%MUSEUM OF VENTURA COUNTY: $10k → 10%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HIS: $5k → 14%CSU CHICO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%GUIDE STAR: $3k → 14%MUSEUM OF VENTURA COUNTY: $3k → 10%WILDLING ART MUSEUM: $30k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION CALIFORNI: $10k → 18%CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 10%CA NATURE MUSEUM: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION CSU CHICO: $10k → 18%CENTER FOR NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP: $5k → 10%CA NATURE MUSEUM: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION CSU CHICO: $6k → 18%CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%WILDING ART MUSEUM: $20k → 14%CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%WILDLING ART MUSEUM: $13k → 14%WILDLING ART MUSEUM: $13k → 14%WILDLING ART MUSEUM: $10k → 14%WILDLING ART MUSEUM: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
VA
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Goodall Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 83%.

Goodall Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$711k · 17 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$711k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+28%

Still filing today

35%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VB
    VENTURA BOTANICAL GARDENS INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $256k · revenue +843%
  • CN
    CALIFORNIA NATURE ART MUSEUM
    5× · 2019–2023 · $70k · revenue +42%
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $68k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • WA
    WILDING ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • MU
    MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY REINSCH LIBRAR
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • II
    Illinois Institute of Technologygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
2
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
3
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
4
Museum Foundation of Pacific Grove Inc

The Museum inspires wonder, discovery, and stewardship of our natural world. The Museum is a catalyst for conservation and a valued learning resource, facilitating active scientific and historical inquiry for all ages.

Arts & Culture
5
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
7
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
8
Laguna College of Art & Design

Laguna college of art & design prepares individuals for careers as creative artists and designers in a culturally and ethnically diverse world through a curriculum that emphasizes acquiring skills based on observation, representation, and…

Education
9
International Society for Arts Science and Technology Dba LeonardoISAST

The mission of the Organization is to identify new avenues to serve the art, science, and technology community. The Organization is recognized as a global leader in the interdisciplinary world of art, science, and technology. For over 50…

—
10
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
11
California Surf Museum

The California Surf Museum serves as an international repository and resource center on the lifestyle sport of surfing through capturing,preserving and chronicling its art, culture and heritage for the education and enjoyment of current…

Arts & Culture
12
The California Museum for History Women and the Arts

The california museum - home of the california hall of fame - engages, educates and enlightens people about california's rich history, its diversity, and its unique influence on the world of ideas, innovation, art, and culture. through…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University Foundation California State University Chico; the most unlike its peers is Sporting California Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HIS: $50,000 · OtherSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISCSU CHICO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherCSU CHICO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCA NATURE MUSEUM: $40,000 · OtherCA NATURE MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $25,108 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTANFORD UNIVERSITY DCI GABIA: $25,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY DCI GABIACANDIDORG: $22,134 · OtherCANDIDORGWILDING ART MUSEUM: $20,000 · OtherWILDING ART MUSEUMUSS INDIANAPOLIS CA-35 LEGACY ORGAN: $14,725 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · Other+8 more: $26,814 · Other+8 moreVENTURA BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $256,000 · EnvironmentVENTURA BOTANICAL GARDENS INCCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $68,194 · EducationCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN…The University Foundation California State University Chico: $56,000 · EducationThe University Foun…+3 more: $6,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA NATURE ART MUSEUM: $70,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA N…MUSEUM OF VENTURA COUNTY: $12,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF VE…+2 more: $3,230 · Arts & CultureListen4Good: $4,000 · Community ImprovementSPORTING CALIFORNIA INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC: $600 · Philanthropy
Other$278,281Environment$256,000Education$130,194Arts & Culture$85,730Community Improvement$4,000Recreation & Sports$2,500Philanthropy$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVENTURA BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $256,000 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA NATURE ART MUSEUM: $70,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $68,194 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe University Foundation California State University Chico: $56,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF VENTURA COUNTY: $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetListen4Good: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPORTING CALIFORNIA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetkidSTREAM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKER NEXUS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION: $730 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VENTURA BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA NATURE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The University Foundation California State University Chico ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF VENTURA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Listen4Good ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds SPORTING CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds kidSTREAM ↗
  • Who funds MAKER NEXUS ↗
  • Who funds ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goodall Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goodall Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goodall Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph