Skip to content

· Public charity

Good Old Lower East Side Inc

To build the power of low-income residents on the lower east side to address displacement and gentrification, preserve and expand the low-income housing stock, assert community self-determination over the use of public space, ensure a clean and healthy environment where people live, work and play.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$393kCivil Rights$232kYouth Development$168kScience & Tech$124kHousing & Shelter$19kRecreation & Sports$14kCommunity Improvement$11kArts & Culture$11k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$11,352
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OFFICE HO JONOT$11,352
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $193k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $119k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $74k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$498k · 5 repeat orgs$473k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$498k
$462k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+73%

Still filing today

80%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’25
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT
    2× · 2017–2018 · $193k · revenue +37%
  • RF
    Research Foundation of the City University of New York
    2× · 2017–2018 · $124k · revenue +22%
  • FA
    FIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $88k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • F
    FIERCE
    one grant, 2022 · $225k
  • MM
    MARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -10%
  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $19k · revenue +73%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Housing Conference Inc

NYHCs mission is to advance City, State and Federal policies and funding to support the development and preservation of decent and affordable housing for all New Yorkers. NYHC is a nonprofit affordable housing policy and advocacy…

Housing & Shelter
2
New York State Tenants & Neighbors Information Ser

The organization provides education, training, tenant organizing guidance and promotion of social welfare and quality of life in New York, primarily in the area of affordable housing.

Community Improvement
3
New York Foundation
—
4
Carribean Equality Project Inc

The Caribbean Equality Project is an NYC-based community organization that empowers, advocates for, and represents Afro and Indo-Caribbean LGBTQ+ immigrants in New York City.

Human Services
5
Community Voices Heard Power Inc

CVH Power is working to make New York a model of democratic participation and progressive policies and programs to improve the lives of poor and working class families across New York

Human Services
6
Housing Options and Geriatric Association Resources Inc

To assist societys most disenfranchised; the elderly, seriously mentally ill adults, the homeless, people living with AIDS and the physically challenged by promoting, fostering and providing the highest quality of housing and services in a…

Health
7
Neighbors Helping Neighbors Inc

Nhn promotes racial justice while empowering low and moderate-income new yorkers to fight for, secure and maintain quality housing and build financial assets. nhn is a hud-certfied counseling agency based in brooklyn, new york.

Housing & Shelter
8
Latino Americanos Unidos Del Bronx Ny Inc
Human Services
9
Jews for Racial and Economic Justice Action Inc

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…

—
10
New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health Inc

The New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH) is a membership organization of workers, unions, community-based organizations, workers' rights activists, and health and safety professionals. NYCOSH uses training,…

—
11
East Harlem Neighborhood Based Alliance Corporation

To improve eceonomic and social conditions through the delivery of crisis intervention services. East Harlem Neighborhood Based Alliance operate programs dedicated for crime victims, homelessness and domestic violence prevention.

—
12
Community Development Project Inc

Takeroot justice provides legal, participatory research and policy support to strengthen the work of grassroots and community-based groups in new york city to dismantle racial, economic and social oppression.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement; the most unlike its peers is Fierce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIERCE: $225,000 · OtherFIERCEMARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC: $200,000 · OtherMARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INCFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC: $87,500 · OtherFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INCASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT: $18,950 · Other+3 more: $35,957 · Other+3 moreHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $193,241 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMEN…Research Foundation of the City University of New York: $124,000 · EducationResearch Found…Community Voices Heard Inc: $80,000 · EmploymentCommunity…Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc: $7,000 · Civil Rights
Other$567,407Human Services$193,241Education$124,000Employment$80,000Civil Rights$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC: $200,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $193,241 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $124,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC: $87,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT: $18,950 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New York FoundationNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New York Foundation · New York Women's Foundation Inc · North Star Fund Inc · The Scherman Foundation Inc · Mertz Gilmore Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Old Lower East Side Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Old Lower East Side Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Good Old Lower East Side Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Good Old Lower East Side Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Good Old Lower East Side’s filings →

    More from the funding graph