· Public charity
Good Neighbor Fund Inc
The organization supports charitable organizations and programs in and around communities where the corporation's members reside and work and promotes such other charitable and educational endeavors permitted under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $184k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $188k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS | $1,200,000 |
| UNITED WAY SPIRIT EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE FUND | $110,000 |
| KANSAS FOOD BANK WAREHOUSE INC | $78,000 |
| HEARTSPRING | $35,000 |
| CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY | $27,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA | $25,000 |
| MARY'S KITCHEN CO ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $20,000 |
| HIS HELPING HANDS INC | $16,000 |
| GUADALUPE CLINIC INC | $15,000 |
| ENVISION FOUNDATION INC | $13,600 |
| HUMANKIND MINISTRIES | $12,000 |
| LENOIRGREENE UNITED WAY | $10,000 |
| LOVE LIKE REMI FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF WICHITA INC | $9,500 |
| PASSAGEWAYS LTD | $8,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $695k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +13%
- KFKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $758k · revenue +42%
- ALASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $420k · revenue +20%
Funded once
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +1%- BOBREAD OF LIFE DISTRIBUTION CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -15%
- UWUnited Way of Green County Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
To support, assist and promote the interests and welfare of the programs and activities of the catholic diocese of wichita which provide health care services and health education to poor, distressed and underprivileged individuals.
Humankind ministries provides street outreach, shelter, affordable housing, supportive services, and basic needs to those experiencing homelessness or poverty in sedgwick county. recognizing the inherent value of each person, we serve the…
The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.
To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.
The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.
Genesis family health is strengthening communities by providing high quality, comprehensive health and wellness services.
United way of el dorado works to advance the common good by creating opportunities for a better life for all by improving the aspects of health, education and income stability. a strong community is built by addressing health, education…
The organization is committed to working with individuals, families, and communities to promote independent living and individual choice to persons with disabilities.
Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascension Via Christi Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is La Familia Senior Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds Center of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds HIS HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds INTER-FAITH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP QUALITY USA INC ↗
- Who funds ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds ENVISION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARY'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds PASSAGEWAYS LTD ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds LENOIR COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH ↗
- Who funds SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EMBERHOPE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SEDGWICK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF PITT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER WICHITA ↗
- Who funds BREAD OF LIFE DISTRIBUTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Green County Inc ↗
- Who funds LOVE LIKE REMI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WICHITA FELLOWSHIP CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WAYNE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Independent Living Resource Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Eastern Carolina Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Belin Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Ima Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · The Walser Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Good Neighbor Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.