Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Goecke Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$302kReligion$56kEducation$40kHousing & Shelter$20kInternational$13kRecreation & Sports$10kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARE FOR FRIENDS$15,000
RAZOM INC$5,000
LINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES$5,000
STELLA MARIS INC$5,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$1,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$1,000
OSU FOUNDATION$1,000
STELLA MARIS INC$500
FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC$500
DING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC$500
SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CCAI DBA CHINESE CHILDREN ADOPTION INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 8%CARE FOR FRIENDS: $15k → 14%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $1k → 11%CCAI DBA CHINESE CHILDREN ADOPTION INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 8%CCAI DBA CHINESE CHILDREN ADOPTION INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 8%CCAI DBA CHINESE CHILDREN ADOPTION INTERNATIONAL: $250 → 8%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $1k → 11%CCAI DBA CHINESE CHILDREN ADOPTION INTERNATIONAL: $250 → 8%ST AUGUSTINE MANOR: $250 → 17%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$420k · 17 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$420k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+32%

Still filing today

82%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalHealthPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    STELLA MARIS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $302k · revenue +172%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • RR
    ROCKY RIVER CITY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SI
    ST ISABEL PARISH IN SANIBEL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • RR
    ROCKY RIVER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
2
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
3
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Dominican University

Dominican University provides instruction to students seeking an Associates, Undergraduate or Graduate degree (some doctorate and certificates), and administers all of its programs without discrimination of race, color, gender, religion,…

Education
11
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

12
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Villa St Benedict and the most unlike its peers is Westlake Chinese Culture Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#5#17#10#3#16
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr20%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%7%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr16%4%35–55yr20%87%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,278

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STELLA MARIS INC — $302,000 · HealthSTELLA MARIS INCST CHRISTOPHER PARISH — $53,400 · OtherST CHRISTOPHER PARISHMAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL — $15,750 · OtherMAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOLROCKY RIVER CITY SCHOOLS — $10,000 · OtherROCKY RIVER CITY SCHOOL…ST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL — $3,200 · Other+11 more — $12,100 · Other+11 moreOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,100 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $4,750 · EducationUniversity of Dayton — $3,500 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $3,400 · EducationCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $3,250 · EducationWESTLAKE CHINESE CULTURE ASSOCIATION — $3,000 · EducationCARE FOR FRIENDS — $15,000 · Human ServicesCCAI — $2,500 · Human ServicesFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC — $2,500 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesRAZOM INC — $10,500 · International+1 more — $250 · InternationalLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterVILLA ST BENEDICT — $250 · Housing & ShelterDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC — $2,000 · Animals
Health$302,000Other$94,450Education$23,000Human Services$20,250International$10,750Housing & Shelter$5,250Animals$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTELLA MARIS INC — $302,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCARE FOR FRIENDS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRAZOM INC — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $4,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $3,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $3,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTLAKE CHINESE CULTURE ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCCAI — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,250 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF CHICAGO FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRHONDA'S KISS — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST AUGUSTINE MANOR — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOneSky — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLA ST BENEDICT — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coltman Thomas J Foundation TaOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coltman Thomas J Foundation Ta · John P Murphy Foundation · Community West Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Goecke Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Goecke Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Goecke Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph