Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$847k
Granted FY2025still arriving
63
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.0MEducation$609kHealth$403kReligion$322kHousing & Shelter$322kScience & Tech$300kRecreation & Sports$184kArts & Culture$172kOther$0
02FY2025 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $478k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $265k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bishop Carroll Catholic High School$83,496
League 42$76,500
Catholic Diocese of Wichita$54,832
Embrace$50,494
Wichita State University$46,177
Individual grant recipient$40,000
Individual grant recipient$39,497
Beyond the Call$32,500
Star Family Cares$30,000
Ability Point$30,000
Newman University$28,000
Via Christi Foundation$27,500
Rainbows United$25,000
Kansas Health Foundation$25,000
Camber Childrens Mental Health$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $641k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Ember Hope Youthville: $50k → 9%Ember Hope: $5k → 9%City Care: $5k → 16%City Center: $6k → 16%City Care: $5k → 16%K E T C H: $5k → 16%The Assistance League: $10k → 16%Ketch: $3k → 16%Raise My Head Foundation: $5k → 16%KETCH: $2k → 16%Wichita Family Crisis Center: $3k → 16%Rainbows United: $51k → 16%Rainbows United: $25k → 16%Catholic Charities: $60k → 16%Catholic Charities: $30k → 16%Catholic Charities: $20k → 16%Catholic Charities: $12k → 16%Harry Hynes Memorial Hospice: $500 → 16%Harry Hynes Memorial Hospice: $500 → 16%Harry Hynes Memorial Hospice: $250 → 16%Envision Foundation: $10k → 16%Independent Living Resource Center: $7k → 16%Wichita Children's Home: $25k → 16%Starkey Foundation: $100k → 16%Starkey Foundation: $72k → 16%Starkey Foundation: $60k → 16%Starkey Foundation: $36k → 16%Starkey Foundation: $22k → 16%Starkey Foundation: $10k → 16%Simply Hygiene: $2k → 16%Simply Hygiene: $1k → 16%Wichita's Littlest Heroes: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 71 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

71 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
107

Total granted

$2.8M
$829k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+19%

Still filing today

48%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $538k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EXPLORATION PLACE INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +95%
  • SF
    STARKEY FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $299k · revenue +139% · 37% of their budget
  • NU
    NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $128k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WICHITA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • WP
    WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $56k · revenue -66%
  • BC
    Benedictine Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
2
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
3
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
4
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
5
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
6
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
7
Kansas Recovery Network
Health
8
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
9
Wichita Adore Ministries

Bringing souls face to face with the Eucharistic Heart of Jesus Christ and forming missionaries of the New Evangelization. The organization has realized this mission by providing music and production services for worship events.

Religion
10
Wichita Women's Initiative Network Inc

Provide women survivors of domestic abuse with educational and employment opportunities fostering healing and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
Guadalupe Health Foundation

To support, assist and promote the interests and welfare of the programs and activities of the catholic diocese of wichita which provide health care services and health education to poor, distressed and underprivileged individuals.

—
12
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascension Via Christi Rehabilitation Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Belvin Literacy Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 211 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/89
Grantees still filing
55/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Habitat for Humanity: $167,990 · OtherHabitat for HumanitySt Joseph House of Formation: $150,500 · OtherSt Joseph House of FormationWichita State University: $116,681 · OtherEmployee Assistance Fund: $110,000 · OtherYMCA Steve Clark Capital Campaign: $101,000 · OtherUNION RESCUE MISSION OF WICHITA INC: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherBishop Carroll Catholic High School: $83,496 · Other+147 more: $1,549,991 · Other+147 moreSTARKEY FOUNDATION INC: $298,797 · Human ServicesSTARKEY FOUNDATIO…CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $121,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIE…RAINBOWS UNITED INC: $76,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOWS UNITED I…EMBERHOPE INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesEMBERHOPE INCTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $25,000 · Human Services+10 more: $64,373 · Human Services+10 moreEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $300,000 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATIO…MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $60,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC THEA…+2 more: $11,500 · Arts & CultureNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $128,000 · EducationWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $55,500 · EducationBenedictine College: $50,000 · EducationFriends University: $28,500 · EducationBELVIN LITERACY INSTITUTE: $22,000 · Education+4 more: $6,492 · EducationHEARTSPRING INC: $45,000 · HealthWICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER INC: $35,000 · HealthBEYOND THE CALL INC: $32,500 · HealthKansas Health Foundation: $25,000 · HealthEPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $22,573 · HealthSHEPHERDS WAY INC: $16,000 · HealthPrairie View Inc: $13,975 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $7,500 · Health+5 more: $19,900 · HealthHUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC: $66,100 · ReligionCRICKET ALLEY MINISTRIES: $12,500 · ReligionLEGACY MINISTRIES INC: $5,500 · ReligionLEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,479,658Human Services$640,670Arts & Culture$371,500Education$290,492Health$217,448Religion$84,100Recreation & Sports$75,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $300,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSTARKEY FOUNDATION INC: $298,797 over 6y, 37% of budgetNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $128,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $121,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $76,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetHUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC: $66,100 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $60,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetGuadalupe Clinic Inc: $58,953 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $55,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetEMBERHOPE INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAbilityPoint Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBenedictine College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTSPRING INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBEYOND THE CALL INC: $32,500 over 1y, 32% of budgetFriends University: $28,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVIA CHRISTI FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HOPE SHELTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $22,573 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBELVIN LITERACY INSTITUTE: $22,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetBOTANICA INC: $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKansans For Life Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSHEPHERDS WAY INC: $16,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetYOUTH HORIZONS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPrairie View Inc: $13,975 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRICKET ALLEY MINISTRIES: $12,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetKANSAS ELKS TRAINING CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC: $10,336 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetENVISION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARK ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMCPHERSON HOUSING COALITION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetASCENSION VIA CHRISTI REHABILITATION HOSPITAL INC: $7,005 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndependent Living Resource Center Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLINTHILLS SERVICES INC: $6,111 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSALINA RESCUE MISSION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCity Center Outreach Inc: $5,787 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLEGACY MINISTRIES INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCARPENTER PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRAISE MY HEAD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBike Walk Wichita Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds STARKEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOWS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMBERHOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds AbilityPoint Inc ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds HEARTSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND THE CALL INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends University ↗
  • Who funds VIA CHRISTI FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita FoundationKS89× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · United Way of the Plains Inc · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Ima Foundation · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · Belin Foundation · The Walser Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 211 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goebel Family-Star Lumber’s filings →

More from the funding graph