Skip to content

· Public charity

Glynwood Center Inc

Glynwood cultivates just and resilient regional food systems so that communities, farmers and the land thrive.

$906k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$330k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.5MCommunity Improvement$210kRecreation & Sports$20kEnvironment$10k
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $359k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $167k
  • $250k+1 grant · $330k
$17,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC$330,000
EVER-GROWING FAMILY FARM$105,000
EL MIMOMEX FARM CORP$62,400
R&R PRODUCE GROWERS LLC$48,000
ROCK STEADY FARM$43,763
RISE & ROOT FARM$42,000
CHASEHOLM FARM$40,000
DEMARIA'S HEMLOCK HILL FARM LLC$35,000
LETTERBOX FARM LLC$22,000
GENTLE TIME FARM LLC$20,700
ANGEL FAMILY FARM INC$20,000
STAR ROUTE FARM$17,500
FARM FRESH CARIBBEAN GROWERS$15,000
FREEDOM FOOD ALLIANCE$14,000
FARMER HUERTA$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $330k → 6%DEMARIA'S HEMLOCK HILL FARM LLC: $35k → 9%STAR ROUTE FARM: $18k → 10%NATIONAL HERITAGE TRUST: $10k → 14%EL MIMOMEX FARM CORP: $62k → 14%PHILLIES BRIDGE FARM PROJECT: $10k → 16%COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $70k → 17%ANGEL FAMILY FARM INC: $20k → 20%COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $75k → 6%SCENIC HUDSON: $15k → 9%STAR ROUTE FARM: $15k → 10%GENTLE TIME FARM LLC: $21k → 11%NATIONAL HERITAGE TRUST: $10k → 14%EL MIMOMEX FARM CORP: $24k → 14%THREE SISTERS FARM: $10k → 16%ANGEL FAMILY FARM INC: $20k → 20%SCENIC HUDSON INC: $10k → 9%FREEDOM FOOD ALLIANCE: $14k → 11%NATURAL HERITAGE TRUST: $10k → 14%ANGEL FAMILY FARM INC: $20k → 14%ROCK STEADY FARM: $44k → 9%FREEDOM FOOD ALLIANCE: $13k → 11%EL MIMOMEX FARM CORP: $20k → 14%EVER-GROWING FAMILY FARM: $106k → 16%ROCK STEADY FARM LLC: $15k → 9%ANGEL FAMILY FARM INC: $10k → 14%EVER-GROWING FAMILY FARM: $105k → 16%NORTH EAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15k → 9%EL MIMOMEX FARM CORP: $10k → 14%EVER-GROWING FAMILY FARM: $105k → 16%ROCK STEADY FARM: $15k → 9%FARMER HUERTA: $11k → 14%ROCK STEADY FARM LLC: $10k → 9%LETTERBOX FARM LLC: $22k → 11%RISE & ROOT FARM: $42k → 14%LETTERBOX FARM LLC: $17k → 11%RISE & ROOT FARM: $16k → 14%CHASEHOLM FARM: $40k → 9%LETTERBOX FARM LLC: $15k → 11%GRANDPA FARM: $12k → 14%CHASEHOLM FARM: $24k → 9%LETTERBOX FARM LLC: $12k → 11%CHASEHOLM FARM: $24k → 9%CHASEHOLM FARM: $12k → 9%R&R PRODUCE GROWERS LLC: $48k → 14%FARM FRESH CARIBBEAN GROWERS: $15k → 14%FARM FRESH CARIBBEAN GROWERS: $12k → 14%FARM FRESH CARIBBEAN GROWERS: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 17 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$1.5M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
0%

Still filing today

24%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    Community Kitchen Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $475k · 61% of their budget
  • EF
    EVER-GROWING FAMILY FARM
    2× · 2024–2025 · $210k
  • EM
    EL MIMOMEX FARM CORP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $116k

Funded once

  • EF
    EVER-GROWING FAMILY FARM
    one grant, 2023 · $106k
  • NC
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • GF
    GRANDPA FARM
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East End Food Institute

East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…

Food & Nutrition
2
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
3
Seed Peace

To grow the local food supply by supporting farmers, preparing food plants for climate change and increasing health giving food availability for people in need

—
4
Stone Barns Restoration Corp Dba Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri

Stone barns center is a nonprofit farm, education, and research center with a mission to catalyze an ecological food culture. since 2004, we have been driving innovation in sustainable farming practices and mindful food choices that…

Arts & Culture
5
Binghamton Downtown Courtyard Market

Downtown Binghamton Courtyard Market is a farmers market serving local farm and food producers and residents and community members in and around Binghamton, New York. The market served over 15 different businesses or vendors and over 500…

Arts & Culture
6
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food to cultivate community and alleviate hunger. through community food access, agriculture, education, and strategic partnerships, we work toward a…

Food & Nutrition
7
Comfort Food of Washington County Inc

The mission of Comfort Food Community is to fight rural hunger with innovative programming that expands access to healthy food and builds community partnerships for lasting change.

Food & Nutrition
8
Glynwood Center Inc

Glynwood cultivates just and resilient regional food systems so that communities, farmers and the land thrive.

Public Benefit
9
Broad River Community Market

To create a thriving, equitable food system by working with local farms to provide crucial access to fresh produce to food insecure people in Cleveland County.

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Harvest of Central Vermont

We bring our community together through gleaning to recover surplus food produced on area farms to feed those with limited access to nutritious, fresh local food, and in the process help the community to gain a greater awareness and…

Food & Nutrition
11
Schenectady Greenmarket Inc

Provide a marketplace to connect farmers and producers to the community, in order to foster sustainable farming, wholesome food, and awareness of our interdependence. To foster and organize the development of farm markets in the City and…

Community Improvement
12
Common Good City Farm

Common Good City Farm is an urban farm in Washington, DC, where community members source fresh food, see sustainable urban agriculture in action, and learn healthy skills. Our mission is to sustain and support a more equitable community…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scenic Hudson Inc; the most unlike its peers is Freedom Food Alliance Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVER-GROWING FAMILY FARM: $210,000 · OtherEVER-GROWING FAMILY FARMEL MIMOMEX FARM CORP: $116,425 · OtherEL MIMOMEX FARM CORPEVER-GROWING FAMILY FARM: $106,000 · OtherEVER-GROWING FAMILY FARMCHASEHOLM FARM: $100,000 · OtherCHASEHOLM FARMKaye Ranch LLC DBA Rock Steady Farm: $83,763 · OtherKaye Ranch LLC DBA Rock Steady FarmANGEL FAMILY FARM INC: $70,000 · OtherANGEL FAMILY FARM INCLETTERBOX FARM LLC: $66,000 · OtherLETTERBOX FARM LLCRISE & ROOT FARM: $58,000 · OtherR&R PRODUCE GROWERS LLC: $56,000 · OtherDEMARIA'S HEMLOCK HILL FARM LLC: $51,921 · Other+19 more: $265,807 · Other+19 moreCommunity Kitchen Inc: $475,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Kitchen IncFreedom Food Alliance Incorporated: $35,000 · Food & NutritionFreedom Food Alliance Incorporate…Scenic Hudson Inc: $25,385 · EnvironmentPHILLIES BRIDGE FARM PROJECT INC: $10,045 · Youth Development
Other$1,183,916Food & Nutrition$510,000Environment$25,385Youth Development$10,045

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Kitchen Inc: $475,000 over 3y, 61% of budgetFreedom Food Alliance Incorporated: $35,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNATURAL HERITAGE TRUST: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $25,385 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPHILLIES BRIDGE FARM PROJECT INC: $10,045 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Kitchen Inc ↗
  • Who funds Freedom Food Alliance Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL HERITAGE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Scenic Hudson Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIES BRIDGE FARM PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dyson FoundationNY15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dyson Foundation · Field Hall Foundation · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · United Way of New York City · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glynwood Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glynwood Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glynwood Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph